What are Chords? What is the smallest unit in physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mason_Free
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Unit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of "chords" in relation to physics, specifically questioning a claim that sound waves are the fundamental building blocks of the universe. Participants express skepticism about the validity of this claim, suggesting it may stem from a misunderstanding or misinterpretation of scientific analogies, particularly in string theory. The analogy by physicist Frank Wilczek compares atoms to musical instruments, highlighting the relationship between quantum mechanics and sound waves. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clarity in scientific communication, especially regarding complex theories like string theory. Overall, the notion that sound waves are the basic unit of the universe is dismissed as nonsensical.
Mason_Free
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
What are Chords? What is the smallest "unit" in physics?

Someone told me they read a Yahoo AP article stating the most basic "building block" of the universe was a sound wave, and upon discovery this had been named a chord(or perhaps cord/kord/etc).

Again, this was an AP article, but I haven't found anything on it.

What is this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


That's nonsense I'm afraid.
Are you sure this wasn't april the 1st?
 
Last edited:


I bet it was http://today.lbl.gov/2012/02/28/smoot-helps-grateful-dead%E2%80%99s-mickey-hart-interpret-music-of-the-cosmos/ .

More seriously, Wilczek has used a musical analogy. I can't locate it now, but IIRC it was about the Schroedinger wave equation and its eigenstates, which are analogous to the wave equation for sound and its harmonics.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Yeah...Someone had told me it might be a misunderstanding of a string theory analogy ..something about tiny strings being the most basic bit of the universe, and these strings vibrate. With different vibrations creating a different particle, etc.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top