MHB What are Left Cosets and How Do You Find Them?

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosets
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
Let $H=\{0;\pm 3;\pm 6;\pm 9;\cdots\}$ Find all the left cosets of $H \textit{ in } \Bbb{Z}$ok I can only see that
From $\textit{H}$ we have $\textit{H}=3 \Bbb{Z}$ thus we cosets of
$1+3\Bbb{Z},\quad 2+3\Bbb{Z} \cdots $ didn't know what the "left cosets" meantthere must be more that could be said about this
so more info welcome
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi karush,

karush said:
didn't know what the "left cosets" meant

Let $H$ be a subgroup of $G$. The left cosets of $H$ are all sets of the form $gH$, where $g\in G$ and $gH=\{gh:~h\in H\}$ by definition. Note that even though $H$ is a subgroup of $G$, $gH$ is not necessarily a subgroup (which is why the phrasing "sets of the form..." was just used); e.g, the left coset $1+3\mathbb{Z}$ of your original post is only a subset of $\mathbb{Z}$, even though $3\mathbb{Z}$ is a subgroup of $\mathbb{Z}$.

With this in mind, when you list all the possible cosets you must let $g$ run through all the elements of the group $G$. In your example this means looking at $k+3\mathbb{Z}$ for all $k\in\mathbb{Z}$. Upon doing so you should find that two cosets $k_{1}+3\mathbb{Z}=k_{2}+3\mathbb{Z}$ if and only if $k_{1}\equiv k_{2}$ (mod 3). Hence, there are only 3 left cosets of $3\mathbb{Z}:$ $3\mathbb{Z}, 1+3\mathbb{Z}$, and $2+3\mathbb{Z}$. In essence this proves a well-known result from abstract algebra that $\mathbb{Z}_{n}\cong \mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}.$

karush said:
there must be more that could be said about this

There certainly is. All of this talk about cosets is leading to the notion of normal subgroups and quotient/factor groups. For example, in the result I quoted above, $\mathbb{Z}_{n}\cong \mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}$, $\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}$ is a quotient/factor group. As you will soon learn, all subgroups of an abelian/commutative group, which $\mathbb{Z}$ is, are necessarily normal. Quotient groups are an important tool, so it is good that you are working hard to understand left cosets.
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...
Back
Top