MHB What are Left Cosets and How Do You Find Them?

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosets
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
Let $H=\{0;\pm 3;\pm 6;\pm 9;\cdots\}$ Find all the left cosets of $H \textit{ in } \Bbb{Z}$ok I can only see that
From $\textit{H}$ we have $\textit{H}=3 \Bbb{Z}$ thus we cosets of
$1+3\Bbb{Z},\quad 2+3\Bbb{Z} \cdots $ didn't know what the "left cosets" meantthere must be more that could be said about this
so more info welcome
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi karush,

karush said:
didn't know what the "left cosets" meant

Let $H$ be a subgroup of $G$. The left cosets of $H$ are all sets of the form $gH$, where $g\in G$ and $gH=\{gh:~h\in H\}$ by definition. Note that even though $H$ is a subgroup of $G$, $gH$ is not necessarily a subgroup (which is why the phrasing "sets of the form..." was just used); e.g, the left coset $1+3\mathbb{Z}$ of your original post is only a subset of $\mathbb{Z}$, even though $3\mathbb{Z}$ is a subgroup of $\mathbb{Z}$.

With this in mind, when you list all the possible cosets you must let $g$ run through all the elements of the group $G$. In your example this means looking at $k+3\mathbb{Z}$ for all $k\in\mathbb{Z}$. Upon doing so you should find that two cosets $k_{1}+3\mathbb{Z}=k_{2}+3\mathbb{Z}$ if and only if $k_{1}\equiv k_{2}$ (mod 3). Hence, there are only 3 left cosets of $3\mathbb{Z}:$ $3\mathbb{Z}, 1+3\mathbb{Z}$, and $2+3\mathbb{Z}$. In essence this proves a well-known result from abstract algebra that $\mathbb{Z}_{n}\cong \mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}.$

karush said:
there must be more that could be said about this

There certainly is. All of this talk about cosets is leading to the notion of normal subgroups and quotient/factor groups. For example, in the result I quoted above, $\mathbb{Z}_{n}\cong \mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}$, $\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}$ is a quotient/factor group. As you will soon learn, all subgroups of an abelian/commutative group, which $\mathbb{Z}$ is, are necessarily normal. Quotient groups are an important tool, so it is good that you are working hard to understand left cosets.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
400
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
721
Replies
6
Views
7K