What are some examples of students making ridiculous math mistakes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter micromass
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights several examples of significant math mistakes made by students, emphasizing the importance of understanding mathematical notation and concepts. One example involves a student incorrectly evaluating the integral of cosine, mistakenly simplifying terms that should not be simplified. Another mistake cited is the misinterpretation of logarithmic properties, where a student incorrectly applied associativity. Participants express concern over the implications of such errors for future generations of students and the expectations of mathematical proficiency. Overall, the thread serves as a cautionary reminder of common pitfalls in math that students should avoid.
micromass
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
22,169
Reaction score
3,327
Here's a HORRIBLE math mistake that I've seen (and somebody actually wrote this on a test)

\int_0^{2\pi}{\cos xdx}=\left[\frac{\sin x}{x}\right]_0^{2\pi}=\frac{\sin 2\pi}{2\pi}-\frac{\sin 0}{0}=\sin - \sin = 0

The sad thing is that the answer is actually correct. And afterwarts that person claimed that you should have gotten partial credit for getting the correct answers...

Here's another one: somebody claimed that

2(\log x)=(2\log) x

because of associativity of the multiplication. I was sad all day after seeing this...

What are some of the most horrible math mistakes you've seen? It could also be instructive to students to see which mistakes not to make!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Haha, that 2pi and 0 one canceling is absolutely hilarious!
 
micromass said:
Here's a HORRIBLE math mistake that I've seen (and somebody actually wrote this on a test)

\int_0^{2\pi}{\cos xdx}=\left[\frac{\sin x}{x}\right]_0^{2\pi}=\frac{\sin 2\pi}{2\pi}-\frac{\sin 0}{0}=\sin - \sin = 0

The sad thing is that the answer is actually correct. And afterwarts that person claimed that you should have gotten partial credit for getting the correct answers...

Here's another one: somebody claimed that

2(\log x)=(2\log) x

because of associativity of the multiplication. I was sad all day after seeing this...

What are some of the most horrible math mistakes you've seen? It could also be instructive to students to see which mistakes not to make!

I think yours (1st one) takes the cake
 
I don't feel sad about these at all. I would be much more worried if the next generation of students could do my job better than I can :smile:
 
I'm with micromass. In a course that is dealing with definite integrals, an instructor should be able to expect a certain level of expertise from the students, such as understanding that the notation sin x does not mean sin times x, nor can (sin x)/x be simplified to sin.

Some years ago I had a student in an intermediate algebra class, who came to see me to question why she had gotten no credit for the correct answer on a homework problem, and her friend had gotten half credit for an incorrect answer on the same problem. I explained to her that 1) the answer was in the back of the book, and 2) none of her work led in any way to the answer she wrote down. In contrast, her friend's work made sense most of the way through her work, but there was a mistake in the last step or so.

The integral problem in the first post in this thread is like the work of the student who came into complain - almost none of it makes any sense at all.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top