What are some good textbooks for advanced calculus with challenging exercises?

AI Thread Summary
For advanced calculus textbooks with challenging exercises, "Engineering Mathematics" and "Advanced Engineering Mathematics" by K.A. Stroud are recommended. These texts provide in-depth explanations of complex topics like gradients, divergence, and curls of vectors. They are noted for their problem sets that exceed the difficulty level of Stewart's calculus. The discussion emphasizes the need for a textbook that balances theoretical understanding with practical exercises. These recommendations aim to meet the request for a rigorous approach to advanced calculus.
nameVoid
Messages
238
Reaction score
0
im looking for a textbook with an advanced level of dificulty in the problems somthing harder than stewart. not an analytical style text but some with a good number of exercises.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi nameVoid,

I use 'Engineering Mathematics' and 'Advanced Engineering Mathematics' by K.A. Stroud.

The advanced book gives some pretty good explanations of advanced Calculus including Gradients, Divergence & Curls of Vectors.

Not too sure if the above is of help. Hope so though.

Regards,

Jus
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Back
Top