What are the average and transition energies for a muonic hydrogen atom?

UniverseZ
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Average Separation of Muon and Proton

Homework Statement



A muon is a particle with a mass of 206.7 me where me is the electron mass, and with the same charge as an electron. It can be captured in "orbit" by a proton to form a muonic hydrogen atom.
a. Find the average separation <r> of proton and muon in the ground state of the system (in meters).

b. Determine the minimum and maximum bound state transition energies to the ground state of the system, in eV.

Homework Equations



normal hydrogen atom
R10=2a-3/2e-r/a

Y00 = √(1/4pi)
Y01 = √(3/(4pi)cos(θ)
Y1±1 = √(3/(8pi))sinθe^(±iθ)


The Attempt at a Solution



a. For the electron, the average separation would be ∫R10rR10r2dr
Now for the muon, is it simply a plug-in of the Bohr radius a = 4∏ε0[STRIKE]h[/STRIKE]/(206.7*m*e2)?

b. I'm actually not sure how to approach this. Would it be something like doing <Y01|H|Y00>? I could be totally off.

Thanks for any input.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
(a) is similar to the electron problem, and the distance just scales as the Bohr radius, indeed.
(b) what are the energy levels of the muon?

You don't need any wavefunctions here.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top