What Are the Best Advanced Mechanics Textbooks for Self-Study?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rainman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics Text
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a suitable formal mechanics text for self-study after completing introductory mechanics in Halliday/Resnick/Walker. Keith Symon's "Mechanics" is highlighted as a potential choice, with some concerns raised about the clarity and correctness of its end-of-chapter exercises, as noted by reviewers. The conversation also touches on whether an intermediate text is necessary before progressing to Goldstein's "Classical Mechanics." It is suggested that if the learner's mathematical maturity is sufficient, they may not need an intermediate book, although caution is advised against jumping directly to Goldstein without adequate preparation. Ultimately, Symon is recommended as a solid option for those continuing their studies independently.
Rainman
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
hi.
i have worked through the mechanics and waves/optics portions of halliday/resnick/walker "fundamentals of physics" 6/e (an introductory physics text), and i want to continue on self-studying mechanics.
could you suggest a formal mechanics text (or maybe it would be called a classical mechanics text?) that continues on from introductory mechanics (my math background 2 university calculus courses and a university linear algebra course).
Keith Symon's "mechanics" 3/e looks good...any comments on that text for those that are familiar with it?
thanks for any help/suggestions.
Jonathan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thanks mmwave.
that was the other book that looked good.
the only thing was that quite a few reviewers on amazon.com complained of cryptic and/or faulty end of chapter exercises,which worried me for self study...how would you rate the end of chapter exercises (difficult problems are okay, but they should be clear and correct, right)?
another question: does this book lead to something like goldstein's "classical mechanics" or should there be a book in between that teaches lagrangian and hamiltonian mechanics prior to goldstein?
thanks
Jonathan
 
If your mathematical maturity is up to it, you don't need an intermediate text before Goldstein. Only you can answer that though.
 
I would NOT recommend jumping right to Goldstein from HRW and a year of Calculus + linear algebra. Symon is a good book. I agree that Cassiday and Fowles is not crystal clear, but I think of it as at a little lower level than Symon. My first choice would be Symon if you can't find a place to take a course.
 
okay, thanks for the help...i ordered symon.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

Classical What are the best intermediate Newtonian mechanics textbooks?
Replies
23
Views
5K
Good textbook(s) for self-studying Quantum Physics
Replies
35
Views
9K
Quantum Introductory quantum mechanics textbook for self-study
Replies
13
Views
4K
Quantum Finding the Perfect Self-Study Book for Intro Stats & Quantum Mechanics
Replies
17
Views
3K
What Are the Best Fluid Mechanics Textbooks for Self-Study?
Replies
1
Views
1K
Is this a good self-study program?
Replies
16
Views
2K
Classical The best introductory mechanics textbook
Replies
39
Views
7K
Textbook recommendations for second year physics (UK university)
Replies
5
Views
3K
Other Can I (with a math major) do a masters in theoretical physics?
Replies
16
Views
2K
Studying What Are the Best Steps for Self-Teaching Theoretical Physics?
Replies
14
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top