What Are the Best Resources for Understanding Different Types of Theories?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the exploration of theories across various fields, particularly in mathematics, business, and physics. A participant seeks recommendations for books and websites that provide specific examples of different types of theories, emphasizing the importance of understanding their assumptions, logic, and mathematical foundations. The conversation touches on the relevance of epistemology, although it clarifies that the focus is not solely on what is knowable. The mention of Feynman's "The Character of Physical Law" suggests an interest in foundational concepts in physics. The discussion also highlights the application of statistical methods in both physics and social sciences, indicating a desire to understand how similar predictive approaches can be utilized across disciplines. The book "Structure of Theory" by Ernest Nagel is referenced, although the participant expresses uncertainty about its relevance to their inquiry.
Avatrin
Messages
242
Reaction score
6
Hi

I recently skimmed through a book called the Structure of Theory. It's a book about what kinds of theories exist.

I would like to learn more about this. What books and websites can you guys recommend?

I would prefer a resource with specific examples of what kinds of theories exist in various fields (my background is mathematics, business and physics, but primarily mathematics).

I would like to learn about their assumptions, but also the logic and mathematics of those theories. Of course, I am not asking for a deep understanding of every scientific field.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Philosophy books on epistemology?
Maybe Feynman's "The Character of Physical Law" (MIT Press)
... it depends on your interest. Do you want a list with a taxonomy?
 
Isn't epistemology about what is knowable? That is not what I am asking for. I'll check out the Feynman book.

I have encountered several different ways of examining and making predictions about physical systems. Sometimes, for instance, in statistical physics you examine how one particle in a gas will behave and assume all particles will, statistically, behave similarly and you assume this can be approximated by a continuous function although you have only finitely many particles.

I assume something similar can be done in social science with people and maybe Earth in geology.

If there is a list with a taxonomy, I would love to see it.
 
Avatrin said:
I recently skimmed through a book called the Structure of Theory.
Author?
 
jtbell said:
Author?
Ernest Nagel

I should add that I am not entirely sure if this book is what I am looking for (after all, I barely skimmed through it).
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top