What are the best tests and statistics indicators for analyzing algae data?

  • Thread starter Thread starter moss888
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plan Test
moss888
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I’m preparing a research report in Aqua maritime specialty; my case study concerns the Macro alga.
My case:
My issue is that there are a lot of tests procedures and statistics indicators those could be used so that I can’t figure out which tests should I take on consideration? Which tests should I avoid? My purpose is to prepare a statistic tests plan and statistics indicators set that explain well and convince the responsible.
My lab experiences:
Case study 1:
I’m studying two kinds of algae (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algae)
1. Algae A
2. Algae B
In three sites:
1. Site A
2. Site B
3. Site C
Those Algae are of sex:
1. Male
2. Female
3. Hybrid(Male and female at the same time like the snail)
The observations are taken in SPSS as follow:
Site Sex Month Quarter Weight
Possible values for the sites:
1 -> Site A
2 -> Site B
3 -> Site C

Possible values for the sex:
1->Male
2->Female
3->Hybrid
Possible values for the month:
1-> January
.
to
12->December
Possible values of the saison or quarter:
1->Harvest
2->Winter
3->Spring
4->Summer
Possible value of the weight
Could be a sacle numeric value with format like 000,00

The Observation concerns just one year (2008-2009)
The observed variable is the weight.
My Goal is to compare and do test according to each:
1. Different sexes per site or location
2. Different sites per sex category

The Observed IV (sample) count is more than 100

Case study 2:
I will study the number of the spore ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spore) those are produced by the two same Algae.
First of all, each Algae is reduced to three sections
1. Inferior section
2. Intermediate section
3. Superior section
The fact is that each section produces different amount of spores, therefore we proceed and cut each Algae to three sections.
1. I studied this production in two different temperatures levels, namely 16 and 25 C.
2. I exposed them to different luminosity intensity level, whishes are tree levels
3. I also exposed them for different luminosity periods 12 hours per day and 6 hours per day
And I came out with different observations of spore numbers. I registered the number of the produced spore per week for six weeks.
Inferior section Intermediate section Superior section
Week 1
Week 2
Week 3
Week 4
Week 5
Week 6
What I’m asking is what is the suitable test set, which test should I avoid, which are the statistics indicators those could be used for each case study.
Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A basic point to clarify is whether you are creating a plan for measurements that will be made in the future and trying to decide how to allocate resources (in statistics, this topic is called "The Design of Experiments") or whether you are preparing a plan to analyze data that has already been collected.

Statistics is a subjective field. If you need approval from certain people, the best thing to do is look up work that they have done and see what methods they have used.

There might be an algae biologist on the forum who happens to read your post and can tell you how to proceed, but I think the rest of us, the Wikipedia articles not withstanding, need to know what you are trying to find out from the data. Is this a "what factors influence..." type of analysis ?
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top