What are the bounds for this strange triple integral over the region E?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the bounds for a triple integral of the form \(\int \int \int y \, dV\) over a region \(E\) defined by specific boundary conditions: \(x=0\), \(y=0\), \(z=0\), and \(2x+2y+z=4\). Participants are exploring the implications of these boundaries on the integration limits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the necessity of positive bounds for \(x\) and \(y\), initially suggesting limits from 0 to 2. However, there is confusion regarding the implications of these bounds on the \(z\) integral, leading to questions about the validity of the proposed limits. Some participants suggest re-evaluating the integration order and the relationships between the variables.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants offering insights and questioning assumptions about the bounds. Some guidance has been provided regarding the integration limits for \(y\) and \(z\), but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach to set up the integral.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of defining the bounds due to the interdependencies of the variables involved, particularly how fixing one variable affects the others. There is also mention of the potential for negative contributions in the integral based on the chosen limits.

planck42
Messages
82
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


{\int}{\int}{\int}ydV over the region E, where E is bounded by x=0, y=0, z=0, and 2x+2y+z=4


Homework Equations


n/a


The Attempt at a Solution


Assuming that x and y must both be positive, which the boundary conditions seem to require, then the most either one can be is 2, so I have the bounds for x and y being from 0 to 2. Then for z, I guessed that 4-2x-2y is above the xy-plane(webMathematica's Three-Dimensional Visualizer doesn't make the picture any clearer), so the integration looks like so

{\int_0^2}{\int_0^2}{\int_0^{4-2x-2y}}ydzdxdy, which becomes
{\int_0^2}{\int_0^2}4y-2xy-2y^{2}dxdy and then
{\int_0^2}4y-4y^{2}dy and finally integrating to
(2y^{2}-\frac{4}{3}y^{3})_{0}^{2}=-\frac{8}{3}, which puzzles me to no end. If I integrate above the xy-plane, I get a negative answer, and if I integrate below the xy-plane, I get a positive answer. Can somebody illuminate me on this nonsense?(I struggled to identify properly the bounds as may be clear to you)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi Planck42! :smile:
planck42 said:
Assuming that x and y must both be positive, which the boundary conditions seem to require, then the most either one can be is 2, so I have the bounds for x and y being from 0 to 2.

nooo :redface:

you can't integrate both x and y from 0 to 2 …

that would include x = y = 2, and then your z integral would be from 0 to -4, giving you a negative contribution! :rolleyes:
 
tiny-tim said:
hi Planck42! :smile:


nooo :redface:

you can't integrate both x and y from 0 to 2 …

that would include x = y = 2, and then your z integral would be from 0 to -4, giving you a negative contribution! :rolleyes:

That makes sense; but now I feel even more lost.
 
ok, start with integrating z from 0 to 4 …

for each fixed value of z, what does y go between? …

then for each fixed values of z and y, what does x go between? :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
ok, start with integrating z from 0 to 4 …

for each fixed value of z, what does y go between? …

then for each fixed values of z and y, what does x go between? :wink:

I don't find it possible to answer both questions as there is only one boundary function.
 
Let's just suppose that x is going from 0 to 2(it should be equivalent to taking z from 0 to 4 if I do this right). Then for a fixed value of x, y should be \frac{4-z-2x}{2}. For a fixed x and y, z should be 4-2x-2y. The problem I have with this is that if I find z for fixed x, I get a z that depends on y, and if I find y for fixed x, then that y is still dependent on z, so there's no acceptable way to arrange the integrals. There must be something that I am missing.
 
hi Planck42! :wink:

just pick 'em off one at a time …

x from 0 to 2;

for fixed x, y from 0 to 2 - x;

for fixed x and y, z from … ? :smile:
 
0 to 4-2x-2y. But how did you get y being from 0 to 2-x for fixed x only?
 
oh now i see what's been worrying you!

if you haven't fixed z, then it's for any value of z (and that includes z = 0, so the maximum for y is 2 - x) :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K