What Are the Chances of Life on Jupiter's Moons and Other Saturnian Moons?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential for life on Jupiter's moons, particularly Ganymede, Europa, and Callisto, as well as Saturn's moons Titan and Enceladus. There is significant interest in the likelihood of water existing on these moons, which is crucial for the possibility of life. The conversation also touches on whether humans could live on these moons if water is present. Additionally, participants question the current technological capabilities for conducting missions to explore these celestial bodies. Overall, the inquiry reflects a genuine curiosity about astrobiology and space exploration.

Which of the following is most likely to have life?

  • Ganymede

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Titan

    Votes: 6 54.5%
  • Enceladus

    Votes: 1 9.1%
  • Europa

    Votes: 6 54.5%
  • Callisto

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • More than 1 of the above

    Votes: 2 18.2%
  • None

    Votes: 1 9.1%

  • Total voters
    11
brother time
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
I was watching a video on the JIMO mission to Jupiter's moons: Ganymede, Europa and Callisto. What is the approximate chance of life for these moons?

And what about Titan, and Enceladus (misspelled?), can they be ruled out?

What is the likelihood for water on these moons? If there is water, can we live (as humans) on the moons?

Finally, do we have the technology to do these missions?

sorry if I am asking stupid questions, I am only 15
BT
 
Space news on Phys.org
brother time said:
What is the approximate chance of life for these moons?

And what about Titan, and Enceladus (misspelled?), can they be ruled out?

What is the likelihood for water on these moons?

If there is water, can we live (as humans) on the moons?

Finally, do we have the technology to do these missions?

sorry if I am asking stupid questions, I am only 15
BT

I'm not qualified to answer your questions, but I am qualified to tell you that your questions are not stupid at all.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top