What are the Coefficients for Partial Fractions?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of a rational function, specifically \(\frac{x-6}{x^2-4}\), and the application of partial fraction decomposition. Participants explore methods for rewriting the integrand and addressing challenges related to the numerator.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods for integrating the function, including substitution and partial fraction decomposition. Questions arise about manipulating the numerator and the role of \(dx\) in the integration process.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different approaches to the problem, with some participants questioning the validity of earlier suggestions. Guidance has been offered regarding the use of partial fractions, and some participants are attempting to clarify their understanding of the coefficients involved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion over the steps involving \(du\) and \(dx\), indicating a need for further clarification on these concepts. Additionally, there is a focus on determining the correct coefficients \(A\) and \(B\) in the partial fraction decomposition, with some noting discrepancies in their calculations.

Yukz23
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I have trouble solving the following integral [itex]\frac{x-6}{x^2-4}[/itex]

If I let u= x^2 - 4, I'm left with 1/2du = x dx

and I'm stuck trying to get rid of that 6 in the numerator?

If someone can help me out, that would be good.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know how to rewrite expressions like 1/((ax+b)(cx+d)) as a sum of simpler fractions?
 
There's another method besides the one that @haruspex mentioned. You can also rewrite the numerator so that it contains a du.

For example,
[itex]\frac{x + 2}{\frac{1}{2}x^2 + 3x}[/itex]

Letting
[itex]u = \frac{1}{2}x^2 + 3x[/itex],

[itex]du = x + 3[/itex].

Then the original numerator can be manipulated algebraically to get a proper substitution involving du, plus an additional term.

Sticking to my example,
[itex]\frac{x + 2}{\frac{1}{2}x^2 + 3x}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{x + 3 - 1}{\frac{1}{2}x^2 + 3x}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{(du) - 1}{u}[/itex]
 
SithsNGiggles said:
[itex]du = x + 3[/itex].
You mean [itex]du = (x + 3)dx[/itex]
[itex]\frac{x + 2}{\frac{1}{2}x^2 + 3x}[/itex]
[itex]\frac{x + 3 - 1}{\frac{1}{2}x^2 + 3x}[/itex]
[itex]\frac{(du) - 1}{u}[/itex]
Filling in the details exposes a flaw:
[itex]\frac{x + 2}{\frac{1}{2}x^2 + 3x}dx[/itex]
[itex]\frac{x + 3 - 1}{\frac{1}{2}x^2 + 3x}dx[/itex]
[itex]\frac{du - dx}{u}[/itex]
 
SithsNGiggles said:
There's another method besides the one that @haruspex mentioned. You can also rewrite the numerator so that it contains a du.

For example,
[itex]\frac{x + 2}{\frac{1}{2}x^2 + 3x}[/itex]

Letting
[itex]u = \frac{1}{2}x^2 + 3x[/itex],

[itex]du = x + 3[/itex].
Actually, [itex]du = (x + 3)dx[/itex]
Then the original numerator can be manipulated algebraically to get a proper substitution involving du, plus an additional term.

Sticking to my example,
[itex]\frac{x + 2}{\frac{1}{2}x^2 + 3x}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{x + 3 - 1}{\frac{1}{2}x^2 + 3x}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{(du) - 1}{u}[/itex]
You end up with only being able to use u for part of the integrand.

[itex]\displaystyle \frac{x + 2}{\frac{1}{2}x^2 + 3x}\quad\to\quad\frac{(du) - dx}{u} \quad\to\quad \frac{du}{u}-\frac{dx}{\frac{1}{2}x^2 + 3x}[/itex]
 
Why are you guys doing the part where its du - dx in the numerator I don't get where the dx part is coming from? and what's its value?
 
Yukz23 said:
Why are you guys doing the part where its du - dx in the numerator I don't get where the dx part is coming from? and what's its value?
This part of the thread was triggered by SithsNGiggles' post, which had an error in it. SammyS and I jumped into stop you being misled by it.
Please go back to my first post.
 
Yukz23 said:
Why are you guys doing the part where its du - dx in the numerator I don't get where the dx part is coming from? and what's its value?
I was merely responding to SithsNGiggles's post -- that's why I 'Quoted' it. His suggestion was erroneous.

What haruspex suggested is the way to go. That is, to use partial fraction decomposition to write [itex]\displaystyle \frac{x-6}{x^2-4}[/itex] as the sum of two fractions, one with a denominator of x-2 the other with a denominator of x+2 .
 
Last edited:
SammyS said:
I was merely responding to SithsNGiggles's post -- that's why I 'Quoted' it. His suggestion was erroneous.

What haruspex suggested is the way to go. That is, to use partial fraction decomposition to write [itex]\displaystyle \frac{x-6}{x^2-4}[/itex] as the sum of two fractions, one with a denominator of x-2 the other with a denominator of x+2 .

ohh is that the integral where we do the A/x-2 + B/x+2 thing? I don't really remember doing that a lot I forgot what the values of A and B would be
 
  • #10
Yukz23 said:
ohh is that the integral where we do the A/x-2 + B/x+2 thing? I don't really remember doing that a lot I forgot what the values of A and B would be
You don't have to remember. Just write down that your fraction equals A/(x-2) + B/(x+2), multiply out, and find the values of A and B that make all the coefficients match up.
 
  • #11
Oh, sorry about that. I forgot to show the step where the fraction was split to du/u + dx/u. Thanks for catching that.
 
  • #12
ok guys thanks I solved this problem pretty sure I'm correct to,
i got
2ln|x+2| + lin|x-2| + C

hmm the solution says - lin|x-2| on the second part , why is it - rather than +
 
  • #13
Yukz23 said:
ok guys thanks I solved this problem pretty sure I'm correct to,
i got
2ln|x+2| + lin|x-2| + C

hmm the solution says - lin|x-2| on the second part , why is it - rather than +

What did you get for A and B in the partial fractions expansion? You should find your - sign there.
 
  • #14
Dick said:
What did you get for A and B in the partial fractions expansion? You should find your - sign there.

I had
A+B=1
-2A + 2B= -6

multiplied top by 2 then substracted with bottom,
2A + 2B = 2
-2A +2B = -6

Subtracting the top with bottom I got
4A = 8
A = 2,
sub A into the first equation

2 + B = 1
2-1 = -B

-1 = B
OH WHOOPS I didnt make B negative when I moved it to the other side!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K