What Are the Core Postulates of Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity?

AI Thread Summary
The core postulates of Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity include the principle of relativity, which states that the laws of physics are consistent across all inertial reference frames, and the constancy of the speed of light, asserting that light's speed remains constant regardless of the observer's or source's motion. An example illustrating the first postulate could involve measuring the mass of an object in different inertial frames, where the results would remain the same. This indicates that physical laws are independent of the frame of reference. The discussion emphasizes that as long as there is uniform translation between frames, experimental results will be consistent. Understanding these principles is essential for grasping the implications of relativity in physics.
rchenkl
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


State two postulate that underlie the Special Theory of Relativity

The Attempt at a Solution


From the notes I have from the lecturer. It says:
The principle of relativity: The laws of physics must be the same in all inertial reference frame.
The constancy of the speed of light: the speed of light must be the same in all inertial frames, regardless of the velocity of the observer or the velocity of the source emitting the light.

My question is:
For the first statement, how do I use an example to explain this? Because I'm not too sure about "the law of physics" really means.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LowlyPion said:

Can I say the physics law in any inertial frame is independent? So when I do an experiment (say measuring the mass of a sphere) on a inertial frame, will be the same as what I do in another inertial frame. Is that correct?
 
rchenkl said:
Can I say the physics law in any inertial frame is independent? So when I do an experiment (say measuring the mass of a sphere) on a inertial frame, will be the same as what I do in another inertial frame. Is that correct?

You have listed the two principles in your original post. If you are talking about independent of frame, then I suppose you can say your "laws" will be valid in one coordinate representation or another.

The other important postulate is the invariance of the speed of c.
 
LowlyPion said:
You have listed the two principles in your original post. If you are talking about independent of frame, then I suppose you can say your "laws" will be valid in one coordinate representation or another.

The other important postulate is the invariance of the speed of c.

So for example, one person is doing an experiment and obtained a result at stationary. Another person is traveling at a speed and do the same experiment. They will obtain the same results regardless the frame they are in. Is that a correct derivation from the first postulate?
 
rchenkl said:
So for example, one person is doing an experiment and obtained a result at stationary. Another person is traveling at a speed and do the same experiment. They will obtain the same results regardless the frame they are in. Is that a correct derivation from the first postulate?

I think as long as there is uniform translation between the frames.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top