MHB What are the cosets of the ring R=Z_4[x]/((x^2+1)*Z_4[x])?

Stephen88
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to list the cosets of the following ring and describe the relations that hold between these cosets.
R=Z_4[x]/((x^2+1)*Z_4[x])
I'm using the division algorithm since x^2+1 is monic in the ring Z_4[x].Now for every f that belongs to Z_4[x] by the division algorithm
f=(x^2+1)q(x)+p(x)=>the cosets are of the the form...a*x+b+I where I is an ideal generated by x^2+1.
x^2+1=0 in the quotient=>a new ring where multiplication between cosets A+I and B+I is is defined by (A+I)(B+I)=(AB)+1 where the relation x^2+1=0 exists
Is is ok?[FONT=MathJax_Math][FONT=MathJax_Main][FONT=MathJax_Main][FONT=MathJax_Main][FONT=MathJax_Math][FONT=MathJax_Math][FONT=MathJax_Main][FONT=MathJax_Main][FONT=MathJax_Math]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: Ring and cosest

StefanM said:
I'm trying to list the cosets of the following ring and describe the relations that hold between these cosets.
R=Z_4[x]/((x^2+1)*Z_4[x])
I'm using the division algorithm since x^2+1 is monic in the ring Z_4[x].Now for every f that belongs to Z_4[x] by the division algorithm
f=(x^2+1)q(x)+p(x)=>the cosets are of the the form...a*x+b+I where I is an ideal generated by x^2+1.
x^2+1=0 in the quotient=>a new ring where multiplication between cosets A+I and B+I is is defined by (A+I)(B+I)=(AB)+1 where the relation x^2+1=0 exists
Is is ok?

They way I would think about the elements of the quotient ring is much the same way that you would think about the elements of, say, $\mathbb{Z}/4\mathbb{Z}$. This is because they are "essentially" the same thing - you have the same division algorithm, etc.

So, every coset has a (unique!) representative of the form $ax+b$. So when you multiply $(A+I)(B+I)=AB+I$ then you do the division algorithm on $AB$ to get an element of the form $ax+b$ with $ax+b=AB\text{ mod }x^2+1$.

Does that make sense?
 
Re: Ring and cosest

So I need to apply the division algorithm on (AB)+I...ok
 
Re: Ring and cosest

StefanM said:
So I need to apply the division algorithm on (AB)+I...ok

Essentially, yes. For example, $(x+I)\cdot (x+1+I)=x^2+x+I=x-1+I=x+3+I$, as you know that $x^2=-1\text{ mod }I$ because $x^2+1\in I$
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top