What are the different accelerations acting on a ballistic missile?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Egomeh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
AI Thread Summary
Ballistic missile trajectories are influenced by various accelerations, notably "propulsive acceleration" and "tangential acceleration of the launch site." Propulsive acceleration refers to the thrust generated by the missile's onboard rockets, which may be asymmetric. In contrast, tangential acceleration relates to the motion of the launch site due to the Earth's rotation, providing an initial speed advantage during launches. The discussion highlights that while tangential velocity remains constant, its direction changes, resulting in non-zero tangential acceleration. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurately predicting missile impact locations.
Egomeh
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi

Im currently looking at ballistic missile curves and how to determin impact locations.

I found an article discussing this.

According to the article several accelerations act on the missile, including two I can't figure out.

These are called "propulsive acceleration" and "tangential acceleration of the launch site"

Can someone explain why these are not the same? or what they represent?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My guess: "propulsive acceleration" accounts for the issue that the propulsion might be a bit asymmetric.
"tangential acceleration of the launch site" would be an acceleration of the device due to recoil or other forces.
 
This seems to explain one of your questions:

“A company called Sea Launch Corporation launched its first satellite into orbit on Sunday. The company launches rockets from a converted offshore oil platform which can be moved to a location on the equator. Why do they launch from the equator?
Because the Earth is spinning, every point on the surface has a tangential speed proportional to its distance from the Earth's axis. Rocket launchers can take advantage of this tangential speed to give their rockets a head start on their journey into orbit, and the greatest tangential speed is obtained at locations furthest from the Earth's axis, i.e. on the equator.”

http://hep.physics.wayne.edu/~harr/courses/2130/f99/lecture11.htm
 
judging from equations (1) and (13) of http://faculty.kfupm.edu.sa/ae/aymanma/images/Ballistic%20missile%20trajectory%20prediction%20using%20a%20state%20transition%20matrix.pdf ,

i think "propulsive acceleration" means the onboard rockets

and "tangential acceleration" seems to mean centripetal acceleration of the launch site :confused:

EDIT:
Bobbywhy said:
Because the Earth is spinning, every point on the surface has a tangential speed proportional to its distance from the Earth's axis

but the tangential acceleration is zero :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
tiny-tim said:
but the tangential acceleration is zero :wink:

[STRIKE]The tangential acceleration is also nonzero, because the tangential velocity, though constant in magnitude, is changing direction.[/STRIKE] Oh, wait, I see what you mean. Yes the Earth is not increasing or decreasing its rotation speed appreciably!. Though, if we want to take a larger view - i.e. we are launching a satellite beyond Earth orbit into the larger solar system, or beyond, then we should consider the velocity of the Earth and of the sun :)
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top