What are the Four Dimensions in Our Space-Time Continuum?

flamingyawn
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Is the 4th dimension time?

0D = dot
1D = line
2D = plane
3D = sphere
4D = time

Am I correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. And welcome to PF, flamingyawn.
 
thanks.. :wink:
 
flamingyawn said:
Is the 4th dimension time?

0D = dot
1D = line
2D = plane
3D = sphere
4D = time

Am I correct?
Yes, one of the four dimensions in our "four dimensional space time continuum" is time but whether it is "the fourth dimension" depends on where you start counting!

Yes, "0 dimensions" would be a dot, but "1 dimension" is not necessarily a line. It could be any curve. For example, the set {(x,y)| y= x^2} is one-dimensional. Similarly, a plane is an example of a two dimensional set but a two dimensional set can be any surface.

A sphere is in 3 dimensions but it is not "3 dimensions" in the same sense that a point, line, and plane "are" 0, 1, and 2 dimensions- it does not encompass all of 3 dimensional space. And, in keeping with the previous examples, you should have "3D = all of space".

And "4D = time" is completely different from the others. "Time" does not have 4 dimensions in the same sense that the others have 1, 2, or 2 dimensions. "4D= time-space" would be better.

The number of dimensions something has expresses how many numbers you need to designate a single "point" in that thing. A "point" has 0 dimensions because you only have the one point to begin with so you don't need to "designate" it at all. To designate a point on a line (or curve) I could arbitrarily assign "0" to one point and measure from that to the point I want to designate and assign it the distance (positive in one direction and negative in the other). To designate a point on a plane, i could set up a coordinate system and use the two number, x and y. To designate a point in space, I need three numbers.

Physicists work with "events"- thing that happen at a specific point, at a specific time. We need three numbers to designate the point and one number to designate the time. That is what we mean when we say that space-time is "four dimensional" and that time is the "fourth dimension".
 
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, one of the four dimensions in our "four dimensional space time continuum" is time but whether it is "the fourth dimension" depends on where you start counting!

Yes, "0 dimensions" would be a dot, but "1 dimension" is not necessarily a line. It could be any curve. For example, the set {(x,y)| y= x^2} is one-dimensional. Similarly, a plane is an example of a two dimensional set but a two dimensional set can be any surface.

A sphere is in 3 dimensions but it is not "3 dimensions" in the same sense that a point, line, and plane "are" 0, 1, and 2 dimensions- it does not encompass all of 3 dimensional space. And, in keeping with the previous examples, you should have "3D = all of space".

And "4D = time" is completely different from the others. "Time" does not have 4 dimensions in the same sense that the others have 1, 2, or 2 dimensions. "4D= time-space" would be better.

The number of dimensions something has expresses how many numbers you need to designate a single "point" in that thing. A "point" has 0 dimensions because you only have the one point to begin with so you don't need to "designate" it at all. To designate a point on a line (or curve) I could arbitrarily assign "0" to one point and measure from that to the point I want to designate and assign it the distance (positive in one direction and negative in the other). To designate a point on a plane, i could set up a coordinate system and use the two number, x and y. To designate a point in space, I need three numbers.

Physicists work with "events"- thing that happen at a specific point, at a specific time. We need three numbers to designate the point and one number to designate the time. That is what we mean when we say that space-time is "four dimensional" and that time is the "fourth dimension".

thanks
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top