What Are the Implications of Light's Speed on Perception and Knowledge?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kfh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Thoughts
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the implications of light's speed on perception and knowledge, emphasizing that if one could travel at the speed of light, they would lack information about their surroundings and any point they approach. This leads to the conclusion that knowledge is contingent upon interaction, as one cannot know the position or state of objects until they engage with them. The double-slit experiment is referenced to illustrate that a photon does not possess knowledge of its path until it is observed, suggesting a deeper connection between observation and reality. The poster seeks further understanding of these concepts and recommendations for reading materials in physics and mathematics. This topic raises intriguing questions about the nature of knowledge and perception in relation to the fundamental limits of light speed.
kfh
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello all, this will be my first post on these forums though I've been lurking about for a while.

I was thinking to myself about light and the maximum speed of light, and I thought of the following:

A photon travels at 'c', the speed of light, in a vacuum.
If it were possible to be there, traveling at that speed, toward some point, 'p', the point would appear to be traveling toward you at lightspeed as well.

Upon thinking further, I realized that you would have no way to know where p is, or your relation to p, or to anything else for that matter. If indeed nothing can exceed the speed of light, you would have no way of having information about anything at all until you interacted with it, after which time of course it is too late to do anything about it.

I considered this in relation to the double-slit experiment, where you cannot know which slit a photon will "choose" to go through until it has done so. Thinking about it in this way, the photon itself does not "know" that either one, the other, or no slit exists at all. If the photon is restricted from this information, perhaps that is somehow reflected in our observation of it.


Anyway, I find this an interesting topic to think about. I'm merely an undergrad studying physics but I would like to know more about this particular topic. Can anyone shed some light on it, or recommend some good reading? Thanks!
 
Science news on Phys.org
Some good authors to read on the subject of neo physics
Michio Kaku
Brian Green
Paul Davis
John Gribbin

Some good books to read on physics
Physics for Dummies
Physics the Easy Way
Physic Demystified
A students guide to Maxwells equations
Quantum Mechanics, A physics adventure

Some good books on math
Idiots guide to Calculus
Calculus for Dummies
All the demystified books on math
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
After my surgery this year, gas remained in my eye for a while. The light air bubbles appeared to sink to the bottom, and I realized that the brain was processing the information to invert the up/down/left/right image transferred to the retina. I have a question about optics and ophthalmology. Does the inversion of the image transferred to the retina depend on the position of the intraocular focal point of the lens of the eye? For example, in people with farsightedness, the focal point is...
Back
Top