What Are the Implications of Space Being the Ideal Medium for Light?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter alba
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Medium Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of space as a potential medium for electromagnetic (EM) wave propagation, challenging the traditional view of a vacuum. Participants reference the Michelson-Morley experiment, which historically tested the existence of aether as a medium for light. The conversation highlights the need for valid references to support claims and emphasizes the importance of established scientific principles, such as the invariance of light speed and the equivalence principle. The consensus indicates that the notion of space as a medium remains largely unaccepted in mainstream physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave propagation
  • Familiarity with the Michelson-Morley experiment
  • Basic knowledge of the principles of relativity
  • Concept of spacetime in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Michelson-Morley experiment on modern physics
  • Explore the concept of spacetime and its relation to light propagation
  • Investigate theories regarding the nature of vacuum and superfluidity in space
  • Study the equivalence principle and its significance in relativity
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the fundamental nature of light and space. This discussion is particularly beneficial for those exploring alternative theories of light propagation and the implications of established scientific experiments.

alba
Messages
140
Reaction score
4
I have read some article that describe space like a superfluid, etc.., I don't know if it is mainstream, but surely everybody agrees the vacuum is not empty at all.

I'd ask you to try to imagine that space is found to be 'the' medium that propagates EM waves: can you explain why this hasn't yet been considered possible? What prevents space from being the ideal medium for light, like air is for sound etc? It would be nice if you would not be influenced by spacetime and relativity. What are minimal requisites?

Apart from the cons, can you tell if, in that case, light speed would be invariant, not influenced by the speed of the observer?, the equivalence principle would be safe? what problems would remain unsolved?

Thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
alba said:
can you explain why this hasn't yet been considered possible?
It has been and there are two words that you could look up. Michelson and Morley.

alba said:
I have read some article
Which one?
 
@alba your premise is wrong, as pointed out by sophiecentaur. We really cannot discuss a wrong premise. We also cannot discuss an undisclosed reference.

If you have an actual valid reference (per PF rules), then please open a new thread to discuss that reference.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K