What are the implications of tetrahedral stacking in diamond cubic arrangements?

  • Thread starter Thread starter InkTide
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cubic Diamond
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the concept of tetrahedral stacking within diamond cubic structures, proposing the addition of extra tetrahedra in the empty spaces of the lattice. This arrangement, with tetrahedra vertices positioned at opposite corners, is compared to the β-cristobalite phase, which features a unique atomic arrangement. The idea suggests that two overlapping crystal lattices could coexist without bonding, leading to potentially novel chemical and physical properties. The challenge lies in ensuring sufficient space between the overlapping lattices to prevent instability. This exploration of tetrahedral stacking could pave the way for innovative crystal structures and emphasizes the need for further research to understand the implications and applications of such configurations.
InkTide
Messages
30
Reaction score
15
In terms of tetrahedral stacking, as occurs in diamond cubic, what I'm describing would be a system with additional tetrahedra in the empty cubes of that figure, but with their vertices on the opposite corners of the cubes that contain them to the "regular" diamond cubic arrangement.

Due to the proximity of the atoms involved, I'd suspect such a system would need to be something like the β-cristobalite arrangement, where the 'corners' of both diamond cubic lattices would be separated by other bridging ligands, to give the overlapping lattice sufficient space to exist without... well, exploding. EDIT: specifically, the β-cristobalite phase.

Such a substance might be thought of as two substances, however, as the two overlapping crystal lattices would never actually connect to each other through bonds outside of defects - they would be simply co-located. This could have very interesting implications for the chemistry of the resulting crystals as well as their physical properties. One might also think of this more generally as the structure of a catenane or rotaxane applied repeatedly, and presumably diamond cubic wouldn't be the only system that could accomplish this... if only atoms would have the mathematical decency to have zero volume.
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org


The idea of exploring tetrahedral stacking in diamond cubic arrangements is a fascinating concept. It presents the possibility of creating a unique and potentially stable crystal structure by adding additional tetrahedra within the empty cubes of the diamond cubic arrangement. The proposed arrangement with the tetrahedra's vertices on the opposite corners of the cubes is reminiscent of the β-cristobalite phase, which is known for its unique arrangement of atoms.

One of the most intriguing aspects of this concept is the potential for creating a substance that is essentially two substances co-located within the same crystal lattice. This could have significant implications for the chemistry and physical properties of the resulting crystals. It also brings to mind the structure of catenanes and rotaxanes, which have been extensively studied for their unique properties.

However, as mentioned, the challenge lies in ensuring that the overlapping lattice has enough space to exist without exploding due to the proximity of the atoms involved. This highlights the importance of carefully considering the dimensions and arrangement of the additional tetrahedra within the diamond cubic lattice.

Overall, exploring tetrahedral stacking in diamond cubic arrangements has the potential to open up new avenues for creating unique crystal structures with interesting properties. It also highlights the need for further research and experimentation in this area to fully understand the implications and potential applications of this concept.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top