What are the negations of complex statements in statement logic?

  • Thread starter Thread starter test_notagain
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on negating complex statements in statement logic, specifically addressing two examples: (i) ∀x∈R ∃y∈R such that x+y=0 and (ii) a scenario involving individuals finding red apples in bags. The correct negation of statement (ii) is "There exists one of us who hasn't found at least one red apple in at least one bag." The participants emphasize the importance of understanding the logical structure, including the use of quantifiers such as "for all" (∀) and "there exists" (∃).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of logical quantifiers: universal (∀) and existential (∃).
  • Familiarity with basic principles of statement logic.
  • Ability to interpret complex statements involving multiple elements.
  • Knowledge of logical negation techniques.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of logical negation in depth.
  • Learn about quantifiers in predicate logic.
  • Explore examples of negating complex logical statements.
  • Practice with exercises on statement logic and negation.
USEFUL FOR

Students of logic, mathematics enthusiasts, and anyone looking to improve their understanding of logical statements and negation techniques.

test_notagain
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. Negate the following statements

(i): [tex]\forall[/tex]x[tex]\in[/tex]R [tex]\exists[/tex]y[tex]\in[/tex]R such that x+y=0

(ii): introduction: Each of us got, let's say, 20 bags of green apples.
Actual Statement: At least one of us (each) found at least one red apple in at least one bag (each). (Each person and each one of it's bags are treated separately)

2. Homework Equations /3. The Attempt at a Solution
No idea. I'm completely lost here.

Please help, as I have no idea how to negate complex/multi-element statements.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

test_notagain said:
1. Negate the following statements

At least one of us (each) found at least one red apple in at least one bag (each). (Each person and each one of it's bags are treated separately) …

Hi test_notagain! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(have an exists: ∃ and an in: ε and a for-all: ∀ :wink:)

Let's try (ii) first …

the opposite of something beginning "At least one of us has …" is "There exists one of us who hasn't …"

can you go on from there? :smile:
 


Thanx tiny-tim, but I still don't get it because there are 3 parts to statement (ii)... And what is the negation of the first one (i)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
10K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K