What Are the Only Regular Figures That Fill the Plane?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mprm86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Regular
AI Thread Summary
The only regular polygons that can fill the plane are the triangle, square, and hexagon. This conclusion is derived from the requirement that the sum of the angles of k copies of a regular n-gon must equal 2π. The equation k(n-2) = 2n indicates that n must be greater than 2 and that n-2 must divide 2n. Testing values reveals that only n=3, n=4, and n=6 satisfy this condition, confirming that no other regular polygons can tessellate the plane. Thus, the proof concludes that triangles, squares, and hexagons are the sole regular figures capable of filling the plane.
mprm86
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Show that the only regular figures that fills the plane are the triangle, the square and the hexagon.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This can be done with algebra after the problem has been restated.

Note that the angle of a corner of a regular n-gon equals (n-2).Pi/n.

To fit the plane, k copies of a regular n-gon must be able to touch with their corners and therefore k angles should make up for a total arc of 2.Pi.
So, k should be chosen such that

k(n-2)Pi/n = 2Pi eq.
k(n-2) = 2n (*) eq.
k = 2n/(n-2).

So, we must choose n such that n-2 | 2n.
This looks already as if there are only few possibities. First note that n must be larger than 2. (Otherwise we don't even have a polygon).

n=3 gives 1|6 which is true, and k = 6/1 = 6
n=4 gives 2|8 which is true, and k = 8/2 = 4
n=5 gives 3|10 which is NOT true
n=6 gives 4|12 which is true, and k=12/4 = 3

How does it go on?

Well, the next quotient will be smaller than 3, so it must be 2, but then this would mean that just two corners n-gon fill an arc of 2Pi and this corner should be Pi, but this does not happen for a finite n.
Therefore, there are no other regular n-gons that tesselate the plane.

---

You can also look at solving the same equation (*) for n, we get:
n = 2k/(k-2)

So k should satisfy k-2 | 2k
So either
(i) k-2 = 1 or
(ii) k-2 = 2 or
(iii) k-2 is odd and k-2|k
(iv) k-2 is even and (k-2)/2 | k

Ad (i) k=3 and n=6
Ad (ii) k=4 and n=4
Ad (iii) k=2i+1 and 2i-1 | 2i+1. It is clear that if i>1 then (2i+1)/(2i-1) < 2, so this leaves no solutions
Ad (iv) k=2i and (i-1)|2i eq. i=2 OR i=3 only. i=2 gives k=4 and we had this already. i=3 gives k=6 and n=3.

This approach gives the same solutions.

QED
 
Thanks alot.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top