What Are the Physics Behind Bouncing on a Trampoline?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gigantron
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trampoline Work
AI Thread Summary
The physics of bouncing on a trampoline involves the transformation of kinetic energy (KE), elastic potential energy (EPE), and gravitational potential energy (GPE) throughout the bounce cycle. As a person descends, they primarily possess KE, which converts to EPE upon hitting the trampoline. At the lowest point, all energy is EPE, and the trampoline exerts an upward force, enhanced by the person's leg push. When reaching the peak of the bounce, energy is entirely GPE, and the cycle begins anew as the person descends. The trampoline's design allows for elastic collisions, extending collision time and reducing peak forces during bounces.
Gigantron
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I was hoping that somebody could explain the physics behind a person bouncing up and down the trampoline. I know the basics as far as what happens to Kinetic Energy, Elastic potential energy, and gravitational potential energy...but there certainly has to be more than this, right? Can someone just explain the physics as to what's happening to an object bouncing on a trampoline on the very bottom, right in the middle, and at the very top?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you've got the basics right there, but in case you don't I'll try to explain it really quickly.

When you come down, right before you hit the trampoline, your energy is almost all KE, with only an insignificant amount of GPE. Immediately, when you hit, it acts like a spring, pushing up on you, slowing you down and building up EPE. When you get to the bottom, you have 0 GPE, 0 KE, and all EPE. Then it starts pushing on you. Additionally, you start pushing with your legs (or you were pushing the whole time, it doesn't matter.) Since you were probably scrunched up, straightening out pushes your body up and your legs into the trampoline, which acts on you with a NF, upwards. This increases the upward force, in addition to the "spring" force. Just when you get to the regular height of the trampoline, it stops pushing (theoretically speaking. The trampoline has some mass, so it would continue a little, but not much). Then, you have a tiny amount of GPE and the rest of your energy is KE. When you get to the top of your bounce, all your energy is GPE, no elastic and no KE. Then you start coming down and the cycle restarts again.

Hope that answered your question.
 
A trampoline provides a near ellastic collision between the person and the bed (surface) of the trampoline, and also extends the time of the collision, reducing the peak amount of force related to the deceleration and acceleration of each bounce. A person can use his/her muscles to increase the force, and the increase in KE will be equal to the net increase in force over the distance of the bounce. Typically most of the effort is performed near the bottom of the bounce, where the total force is greatest. Note the forces in a competitive situation are large enough that a person can't bend the legs very much without the legs buckling, but only a small amount of relative leg motion is required to maintain or increase KE on a high bounce with high forces involved. Actually it's possible to generate enough force by swinging arms around in a circle at the right moments with the legs kept stiff on a quality trampoline to increase the KE for a fairly high bounce.
 
The trampoline "membrane" is under "in plane" tensile stress (which is initially horizontal). When you exert a downward force on the center of the membrane, the center moves down, and this changes the orientation of the membrane, so that, now the membrane stress has a vertical component. This is the force that the trampolene exerts on you. Take a rubber band, and stretch it horizontally between your fingers. Now push down on the center of the rubber band, and feel the restoring force.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
5
Views
11K
Back
Top