What Are the Probabilities of Different Types of Numbers in an Infinite Book?

  • Thread starter Thread starter starfish99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Numbers
AI Thread Summary
In an infinitely large book containing every real number between 0 and 10, the probability of randomly selecting a rational number is 0, as is the probability of selecting an irrational number that is not transcendental. Conversely, the probability of selecting a transcendental number is 1. This conclusion arises from the uncountability of real numbers and the application of Lebesgue measure as a probability measure. Thus, the sum of these probabilities equals 100%.
starfish99
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Suppose I had an infinitely large book that had every real number between 0 and 10. I open this book at random and randomly select a number.
What is the probability that the number is rational?
What is the probability that the number is irrational, but not transcendental?
What is the probability that the number is transcendental?

Would the sum of these probabilities be 100%
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Even an infinitely large book couldn't hold the reals, since books are essentially list, ordered by page number and character.
 
Ignoring the fact that the reals are uncountable, and assuming the lebesgue measure as a measure of probability, the answers are successively 0,0 and 1, and yes the sum is 1.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top