I What are the properties of a plane cut into regions by a set of lines?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Davis 97
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interpretation
Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44
Problem: Let ##L## be a set of ##n## lines in the plane in general position, that is, no three of them containing the same point. The lines of ##L## cut the plane into ##k## regions. Prove by induction on ##n## that this subdivision of the plane has ##\binom{n}{2}## vertices, ##n^2## edges, and ##\binom{n}{2} + n + 1## cells.

I don't need help solving this problem, I just need help interpreting it. What does it mean that the plane is cut into ##k## regions? I thought that the number of regions was determined by ##n##. Also, what's the point of the ##k## if we're not proving anything about it?

Finally, what is meant by cells? Also, are edges the finite segments between intersections?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mr Davis 97 said:
What does it mean that the plane is cut into ##k## regions
Draw two lines: you get 4 regions, 1 vertex
Draw three lines: you get 7 regions, 3 vertices
Draw another line: you get 11 regions, 6 vertices
You see ##k## back in the number of 'cells'
Mr Davis 97 said:
edges the finite segments between intersections
some of them are finite, some infinite

My main tip: make a few sketches -- the question becomes clear and the answer becomes clear as well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top