What are the properties of open sets in X x Y for a continuous projection map?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the continuity of the projection map p: X x Y -> X and the properties of open sets in the product space X x Y. To prove continuity, it's essential to understand the structure of open sets, which are formed from basis elements through arbitrary unions and finite intersections. The challenge arises when determining the preimage of open sets under the projection map, particularly when dealing with closed sets in Y. It is noted that for a point x in X, the preimage p^{-1}(\{x\}) results in the set \{x\} x Y, indicating that the projection map retains certain properties of openness depending on the nature of the sets involved. The conversation highlights the need for a deeper exploration of open and closed sets in the context of continuous maps.
sparkster
Messages
153
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to prove some stuff that involves the projection map, say p:X x Y ->X. But I need to know if it's continuous. If a map is continuous, then the preimage of a open/closed set is open/closed.

The problem is, what do open sets in X x Y look like? I know what the basis elements are, and the open sets would be arbitrary unions and finite intersections, but is there any way to generalize?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need to know all open sets, you just need to show that some particular sets are open.
 
Well, yeah, but I thought that if there was a way to list all the open sets, that would take care of it.

Ok, if I take p(A) to be open, I need to show that the preimage is open. The preimage would be A x B, where A is open in X. If B is open, then I'm done. But if B is closed, I don't know what to do.
 
So p: X \times Y \to X and p((x,y)) = x. But now think about it what sets will give you \{x\} as an image? p((x,y)) = x for all y \in Y. So p^{-1}(\{x\}) = \{x\} \times Y. I think you can take it from there.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top