What are the quantum numbers of the Higgs boson?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the quantum numbers of the Higgs boson, specifically exploring how these numbers are deduced from theoretical frameworks such as quantum field theory (QFT) and the Standard Model (SM). Participants examine the implications of the Higgs mechanism and related Lagrangian formulations, as well as the effects of introducing additional Higgs doublets.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the Higgs boson must have the quantum numbers of the vacuum, suggesting it has quantum numbers 0++.
  • Another participant points out that in more complex Higgs models, such as those with a second Higgs doublet, additional charged Higgses and neutral states emerge, leading to different quantum numbers for some neutral Higgses (0+ and 0-).
  • A participant argues that the quantum numbers can be considered fixed based on the definition of the vacuum expectation value and the expansion around it, implying that the Higgs boson's quantum numbers must align with this minimum.
  • It is mentioned that the introduction of a self-coupling term in the Lagrangian reinforces the notion that the quantum numbers are even.
  • One participant raises a question regarding which neutral Higgs state corresponds to the condensate in models with multiple Higgs doublets.
  • Another participant explains that the Higgs boson is a scalar particle, transforming even under parity transformation, and discusses its C-parity based on decay processes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the quantum numbers of the Higgs boson, particularly in relation to different models. There is no consensus on the implications of introducing additional Higgs doublets, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific quantum numbers in more complex scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the discussion relies on specific assumptions about the models being considered, such as the simplest Higgs models versus those with additional doublets. The implications of these assumptions on the deduced quantum numbers are not fully resolved.

Jochent
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I have studied QFT, the SM and the Higgs mechanism when I was in university and after reading an article from CMS (CERN) about the spin-parity measurement of the HZZ channel, which shows that J^{P}=0^+ is favoured versus J^{P}=0^-, I went back to the theory of the Higgs boson.

I am struck by the fact that the theory books do not explain how the quantum numbers of the Higgs boson are deduced. (in particular parity P, charge conjugation C and time reversal T) The books that I have just cover that the SM Higgs boson has J^{PC}=0^{++}.

I would like to understand how one deduces this. Is this extracted from the Higgs Lagrangian and if so, how does one do it?


Thanks a lot !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the vacuum state contains a Higgs condensate, the Higgs boson must also have the quantum numbers of the vacuum, namely 0++.
 
Bill is correct, provided that you consider only the simplest Higgs models. If you put in a second Higgs doublet, you get two charged Higgses, and three neutrals. Two of the three neutrals are 0+ and the third is 0-.

In the simplest model, you need hhh and hhhh couplings. If the Higgs held any conserved parity quantum number that was odd, you could not have hhh couplings. So they are all even.
 
Thank you both for the quick answers.

So technically one could say that the quantum numbers are fixed since the minimum is, or more correct can be, defined as \phi_0=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{pmatrix}0 \\ v\end{pmatrix} with v the vacuum expectation value.
Since the fact that H is introduced as the expansion around this minimum as \phi(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{pmatrix}0 \\ v+H(x)\end{pmatrix} , H has to comply with the minimum itself and therefore its quantum numbers should be compatible with the minimum. Is this a correct reasoning ?

Then secondly, after the reparametrization of the Lagrangian due to the expansion around the chosen minimum, a H^3 self-coupling term arrives in the Lagrangian, which comfirms the fact that all the quantum numbers have to be even.


Thanks again ! It feels like my QFT is getting rusty.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
If you put in a second Higgs doublet, you get two charged Higgses, and three neutrals. Two of the three neutrals are 0+ and the third is 0-.
Which one is the condensate?
 
Jochent said:
Hi everyone,

I have studied QFT, the SM and the Higgs mechanism when I was in university and after reading an article from CMS (CERN) about the spin-parity measurement of the HZZ channel, which shows that J^{P}=0^+ is favoured versus J^{P}=0^-, I went back to the theory of the Higgs boson.

I am struck by the fact that the theory books do not explain how the quantum numbers of the Higgs boson are deduced. (in particular parity P, charge conjugation C and time reversal T) The books that I have just cover that the SM Higgs boson has J^{PC}=0^{++}.

I would like to understand how one deduces this. Is this extracted from the Higgs Lagrangian and if so, how does one do it?
In Standard model Higgs boson is a scalar particle having constructed from potential which respects ##\phi→-\phi##. It is the only scalar particle in SM ( not to be confused with some pseudoscalar particles which we know), hence it transforms even under parity transformation.

It is a scalar particle hence zero value of J. Also to see the C-parity, you can look at one possible decay which is it's decay to two photons. C-parity of a photon is -1, hence C-parity of Higgs boson is ##(-1)^2=1## .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K