What Are the Secrets Behind 'Junk' DNA and Its Importance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GiZeHy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dna
AI Thread Summary
Over 97% of the human genome was historically labeled as "junk DNA," but recent research has revealed its significance beyond mere regulatory functions. This DNA includes remnants of viral DNA, potential reservoirs for new advantageous genes, and regions that encode functional RNA, such as siRNA and antisense RNA. Some areas contribute to gene translocation and chromosome stability. The understanding of junk DNA is evolving, with evidence showing that it plays essential roles in life; removing these regions can be lethal to organisms. The ongoing research continues to uncover patterns and functions within this previously misunderstood portion of the genome.
GiZeHy
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
junk DNA?

hi
over 97% of genes in the human genome are called 'junk dna'. what do you think is the junk dna for? ( beside regulatory functions, accumulated DNA of failed viruses, reservoire from which potentially advantageous new genes can emerge,... )
please give me your assumptions, worries, hopes, wildest dreams about that one...
i want to see bloody fingertips ;)
 
Biology news on Phys.org
the "remnant DNA"? I was meaning to ask same question for a few days now, what a de ja vu

oh and I hope there are some 'patterns' in it too.. it sure is a wild thing to have discovered.. and anybody who doubts it is a damned fool
 
some of this DNA has since been found to encode for functional RNA (siRNA, antisense, etc.). other regions are actively involved in translocation of genes. other regions are thought to merely add stability to the chromosome.

the mystery is slowly being unravelled. but nonetheless, no one calls it "junk" dna anymore since it has been found to be essential to life - cutting out regions of junk DNA will often kill an organism.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top