What are the steps to solving a velocity-time problem with uniform acceleration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 200krisx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time Velocity
AI Thread Summary
To solve a velocity-time problem with uniform acceleration, start by sketching a velocity-time graph for the journey, which includes three phases: acceleration, constant speed, and deceleration. Next, calculate the time taken for deceleration, which is found to be 1.5 seconds based on the relationship between acceleration and deceleration. The final speed (V) can be determined using the equation s = ut + 1/2at^2, where initial acceleration needs to be calculated first. Breaking the problem into three distinct zones helps clarify the relationships between speed, distance, and time. Understanding these steps is crucial for effectively tackling similar physics problems.
200krisx
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A motorist starting a car from rest accelerates uniformly to a speed of V ms in 6 seconds. He maintains this speed for 50 seconds and then applies the brake sand decelerates uniformly to rest. His deceleration numerically equal to four times the initial acceleration. The total distance traveled is 1000 meters

Homework Equations



1) Sketch a vt graph for the journey
2) calculate the time during which the deceleration takes place
3) calculate value of v
4) Calculate the initial acceleration.

The Attempt at a Solution



1) is straight forward
2) a= 6/4 =1.5s
3) can you use s= ut+ 1/2at^2?
4) .?

I struggle with these types of question so any help would be greatly appreciated,

Thanks,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
2) Agree.
3) That is good one to use, but I think it might be easier to solve 4), a, first.
4) Break the problem up into 3 time/distance zones. Looking at zone 1 (0<t<6) first, what would you get for v (at the 6-second point) in terms of a? What would you get for the distance traveled in zone 1, in terms of a, etc...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top