What are the theorems of Social Science that it deserves to be called

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phrak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Science
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the classification of social science as a legitimate field of study, questioning whether it possesses fundamental theorems akin to those in natural sciences. Participants explore the definition of social science, which encompasses various branches such as anthropology, economics, education, geography, history, law, linguistics, and political science. The conversation highlights the distinction between "theorems" and "hypotheses," suggesting that while social sciences may not have strict mathematical proofs, they do contain significant theories, such as Marxist theory, which illustrates broader social concepts. The dialogue emphasizes the need for clarity regarding the theoretical frameworks within social sciences and their validity as scientific disciplines.
Phrak
Messages
4,266
Reaction score
7
What are the theorems of Social Science that it deserves to be called a science?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Do you understand what social science is? It appears not.

Perhaps here is a good start for you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_sciences
Branches of Social Science:
# 2.1 Anthropology
# 2.2 Economics
# 2.3 Education
# 2.4 Geography
# 2.5 History
# 2.6 Law
# 2.7 Linguistics
# 2.8 Political science

Are you saying that none of the above contain any theories or the like? Or are you just curious if there are any theories?
 
Last edited:


jarednjames said:
Do you understand what social science is? It appears not.

Perhaps here is a good start for you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_sciences


Are you saying that none of the above contain any theories or the like? Or are you just curious if there are any theories?

I'm asking if their are any fundamental theorems of social science.
 


Not sure if the term "theorem" is used, but here's an example of a broad "theory".

"Marxist theory contends that socialism is just a transitional stage on the road to communism"
(from wikipedia, referenced)

Now surely you understand one can't write down a concise mathematical proof of this. I suspect the word "hypothesis" would be more appropriate to social studies.
 

Similar threads

Replies
43
Views
598
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
302
Back
Top