What Are the Uncommon Coordinate Systems in Physics Beyond the Basics?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
16 replies · 3K views
Falgun
Messages
77
Reaction score
46
I have come across Cartesian, Polar, Cylindrical & Spherical Coordinate Systems so far and was wondering if someone could tell me which are the uncommon systems used in physics which everyone says that they exist but no one explicitly mentions. Is there a "standard reference" or are they just passed down as word of mouth? Sorry if the question is a bit misguided because I have no idea about this topic.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All of them are common each making use of symmetry of the system you are tackling. That's the reason why you learn them in your curriculum.
 
anuttarasammyak said:
All of them are common each making use of symmetry of the system you are tackling. That's the reason why you learn them in your curriculum.
I understand that. I am asking if you could name and explain some uncommon ones?
 
As a short example skew coordinates. In GR metric tensor ##g_{ij}## defines what coordinate system the system has.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jasonRF, Falgun and vanhees71
Parabolic coordinates are of some use in the Coulomb-scattering problem in quantum mechanics and for the bound state problem when treating the Stark effect. They are always a good choice if you have a spherically symmetric problem in a situation, where some direction is preferred by the physical situation. In the scattering problem that's the direction of the incoming-particle momentum; in the case of the Stark effect it's the direction of the external electric field.

These 3D orthogonal coordinates are the ones for which the 3D Laplace operator and thus the Helmholtzoperator separates. For a thorough treatment, see the great books by Morse and Feshbach, Methods of Theoretical Physics (2 vols.).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jasonRF, Falgun and alan123hk
Most coordinate systems have no name. They are described by their mathematical properties instead. These can be equations to transform from named systems to the unnamed system or the metric written in the new coordinates.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jasonRF, Falgun, alan123hk and 1 other person
Falgun said:
I have come across Cartesian, Polar, Cylindrical & Spherical Coordinate Systems so far and was wondering if someone could tell me which are the uncommon systems used in physics which everyone says that they exist but no one explicitly mentions. Is there a "standard reference" or are they just passed down as word of mouth? Sorry if the question is a bit misguided because I have no idea about this topic.

Moon and Spencer's "Field Theory Handbook" is a compendium of 40 coordinate systems, providing separation equations and solutions for the Laplace and Helmholtz equations in each.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: alan123hk, jasonRF, vanhees71 and 2 others
If you study geodesy using Heiskanen and Moritz, you will run into elliptic coordinates pretty extensively
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: alan123hk
Andy Resnick said:
Moon and Spencer's "Field Theory Handbook" is a compendium of 40 coordinate systems, providing separation equations and solutions for the Laplace and Helmholtz equations in each.
There are many different coordinate systems to choose from. If the shape of the object is deliberately designed to correspond to these special coordinate systems in the engineering design, this may simplify the analysis and speed up the efficiency of the simulation calculation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
The ##\mathrm{H}_2^+## molecular hamiltonian is separable in elliptical coordinates.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71