What are vector/tensors operators in QM or in general any vector space

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the nature of vector and tensor operators in quantum mechanics (QM) and their distinction from scalar operators. Participants explore the mathematical properties and transformation behaviors of these operators, particularly in relation to angular momentum.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the definition and differences between vector/tensor operators and scalar operators in QM.
  • Another participant describes vector and tensor operators as sets of operators that transform into linear combinations of each other under rotations, using angular momentum operators as an example.
  • A further contribution discusses specific commutation relations involving vector operators and angular momentum, indicating that these relations arise from the transformation properties of the operators.
  • One participant clarifies that commutation relations may not universally apply to all vector operators, suggesting that examples of mutually commuting operators could also be considered.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence and nature of commutation relations among vector operators, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved regarding the general applicability of these relations.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the potential dependence on specific definitions of vector and tensor operators, as well as the context of angular momentum in quantum mechanics.

Sagnik.
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am interested in knowing that in QM what vector/tensor operators are? In fact how do they differ from scalar operators?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A vector or tensor operator is a set of operators, such that when you perform a rotation they go into linear combinations of each other, the same way that the components of a vector or tensor do. Thus angular momentum J is a set of three operators Jx, Jy, Jz. Under a rotation about the z axis,
Jz' = Jz, Jx' = Jx cos θ + Jy sin θ,

Jy' = Jy cos θ - Jx sin θ.

Note this says nothing about any commutation relations that the operators might have.
 
In fact, there are some commutation relations, following from the fact that [itex]\hat{V}_j[/itex] are vector operators (you can generalize the following for tensor operators of any rank), namely those with angular-momentum operators:

[tex][\hat{J}_k,\hat{V}_l]=\mathrm{i} \epsilon_{klm} V_m.[/tex]

This is, because of the transformation relations you've just given, because rotations are generated by the angular-momentum operators. A rotation is given by the unitary transformation

[tex]\hat{U}(\vec{\varphi})=\exp(\mathrm{i} \hat{\vec{J}} \cdot \vec{\varphi}).[/tex]

The rotation is given by

[tex]\hat{\vec{V}}'=\hat{U}(\vec{\varphi}) \hat{\vec{V}} \hat{U}^{\dagger}(\vec{\varphi}).[/tex]
 
What I meant was, commutation relations may or may not exist among the operators themselves. I used the J's as an example of a vector operator, and they have the SO(3) commutators typical of angular momentum, but three operators which mutually commute could have been used instead.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K