What Books Continue Ballentine's Approach to Quantum Statistical Mechanics?

WiFO215
Messages
416
Reaction score
1
Having learned the fundamentals of quantum mechanics from Ballentine, I am now looking around for books on quantum statistical mechanics. However, I find most of them in-complete. I don't want to fuss, but I really liked Ballentine's approach and would like to continue with something similar. Do you guys know of any books that approach the subject of quantum stat mech using the statistical interpretation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's difficult to define the 'statistical interpetation'. All formulations of quantum mechanics take the statistical feature as being fundamental, some of them more than others, with Ballentine's <ensemble interpetation> above all.

By reading a book on statistical mechanics, you should <feel> which view/approach the author takes when using the quantum mechanical notions. I haven't seen a book on statistics which has Ballentine's views on quantum mechanics as starting point.
 
Damn. Neither have I.
 
I have not seen this book you speak of, just went through the contents on Amazon's free preview. Based purely on that, the approach in Sakurai (Modern QM) seems to be kind of similar.

If you want a start, you can look through Sakurai's book. It has one section on the Density matrix (3. something I think) which could serve as a good starting point for a study of Quantum Statistics.

If I had the choice entirely left to me (from scratch), I'd get people to go through the two Landau-Lifgarbagez books (QM & SP1). They're quite comprehensive and pretty challenging. Unfortunately or otherwise, the former deals mainly with QM in the position representation using wave functions
 
I have gone through two volumes of Cohen (Quantum Mechanics). Now I need a a book on Quantum Statistical Mechanics. The book should use axiomatic formulation using density matrix. Please give me a suggestion. (I'm also introduced with 2nd quantization slightly)
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top