What Boundary Conditions Are Needed for Time-Dependent Hermitian Operators?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the proof involving time-dependent Hermitian operators, specifically a fourth derivative operator. The operator is represented as A, and the eigenvalue-eigenvector equation is established with a time-dependent eigenvector |\psi(t)⟩ and eigenvalue a(t). Participants emphasize that for the operator to be Hermitian, it must be self-adjoint, leading to the suggestion that A could be expressed as i∂^4/∂t^4. The main challenge discussed is identifying the necessary boundary conditions for the eigenfunctions, with the understanding that a(t) is a real number. The conversation highlights the importance of these concepts in the context of quantum mechanics.
Je m'appelle
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
Hello, could you please give me an insight on how to get through this proof involving operators?

Proof:
Given an eigenvalue-eigenvector equation, suppose that the vectorstate depends on an external parameter, e.g. time, and that over it acts an operator that is the fourth derivative w.r.t. time. If this operator is hermitian, find the most general operator possible that satisfies these conditions and what are the boundary conditions on the eigenfunctions that are needed.
Attempt:

Using A as our hermitian operator and |\psi (t) \rangle for its time dependent eigenvector, and a(t) for its eigenvalue, I suppose the simplest eigenvalue-eigenvector equation one can write would be

A|\psi (t) \rangle = a(t) |\psi (t) \rangle

As for the operator, I'd say it follows directly that

A \sim \frac{\partial^4}{\partial t^4}

a(t) = a^*(t)

Now, based on the assumption I've been correct so far, comes the part where I'm stuck. I understand the general concept of eigenvalues and eigenfunctions, i.e. a(t) would generate a set of eigenfunctions \psi(t), however I'm not fully aware which boundary conditions would be necessary from the provided information aside from the fact that a(t) is a real number. Any hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Je m'appelle said:
Hello, could you please give me an insight on how to get through this proof involving operators?

Proof:
Given an eigenvalue-eigenvector equation, suppose that the vectorstate depends on an external parameter, e.g. time, and that over it acts an operator that is the fourth derivative w.r.t. time. If this operator is hermitian, find the most general operator possible that satisfies these conditions and what are the boundary conditions on the eigenfunctions that are needed.
Attempt:

Using A as our hermitian operator and |\psi (t) \rangle for its time dependent eigenvector, and a(t) for its eigenvalue, I suppose the simplest eigenvalue-eigenvector equation one can write would be

A|\psi (t) \rangle = a(t) |\psi (t) \rangle

As for the operator, I'd say it follows directly that

A \sim \frac{\partial^4}{\partial t^4}

a(t) = a^*(t)

Now, based on the assumption I've been correct so far, comes the part where I'm stuck. I understand the general concept of eigenvalues and eigenfunctions, i.e. a(t) would generate a set of eigenfunctions \psi(t), however I'm not fully aware which boundary conditions would be necessary from the provided information aside from the fact that a(t) is a real number. Any hints?
Bonjour "Je m'appelle"... En ce qui me concerne, moi je m'appelle Patrick :-)Write the operator as ##C \partial^4/\partial t^4 ## where C is a constant. What is the basic condition for such an operator to be hermitian?
 
nrqed said:
Bonjour "Je m'appelle"... En ce qui me concerne, moi je m'appelle Patrick :-)Write the operator as ##C \partial^4/\partial t^4 ## where C is a constant. What is the basic condition for such an operator to be hermitian?

Bonjour Patrick! Merci pour ta réponse. Ça va? As for your question, I'd say it's the operator being self-adjoint, i.e. A = A^{\dagger}, also I believe I know where you're going at, I should have written A = i \frac{\partial^4}{\partial t^4} instead?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top