What can be found in the MT curves of superconductors?

Andy Huang
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am confused about the magnetic susceptibility vs. temperature curves (or MT) of superconductors (SCs).

In the normal conduction state (I measured from 4.5K to 300K), the susceptibility curve can obey the Curie-Weiss law. But when I fitted the data via the Curie-Weiss law in a different temperature range, different results (effective magnetic moment) came out.

How should I select the temperature range in the normal state for fitting the curves with the Curie-Weiss law?

Also, I synthesized a series of SC samples with different Tc. How should I compare the susceptibility curves of SCs with different Tc? What physical properties can be concluded form those MT curves?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A quick question: when you fit, how are you plotting the data? You probably already know this, but you should plot the inverse susceptibility versus temperature. The Curie-Weiss behavior is then a linear relation.

Also, what "different temperature range" did you use?
 
I used the fit function χ=χ0 + C/(T-θ), χ0 =χdia +χPauli = temperature independent contribution.
Taking χ0 into account, I only ploted the susceptibility vs. temperature curve. The temperature range selected for fitting is above the superconducting critical temperature, such as from 50K to 140K, resulting the effective magnetic moment 2.048μB (Fe2+). Another range from 100K to 140K gave 1.842μB.
I upload the data file and appreciate your help for checking it again.

Thanks for helping the novice.
 

Attachments

From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top