What can you do with Probability and Statistics?

AI Thread Summary
Knowledge of probability and statistics is essential in physics and chemistry, particularly in interpreting experimental results and understanding measurement accuracy. It allows students to critically assess statistical claims in the media and develop mental models for predicting outcomes. In pure science contexts, concepts from statistical mechanics and quantum mechanics rely on advanced probability theory. Additionally, foundational topics like counting, combinatorics, and distributions are frequently applied across various scientific disciplines. Mastery of these concepts enhances decision-making and risk assessment in complex systems.
zyj
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I'm a high-school/dual-enrolled CC student, and in the fall, I plan to take a Prob/Stat class that has multivariable calculus as a co-requisite (I'll probably do its sequel class in the spring as well). What exactly can you do in Physics or Chemistry with knowledge of Prob/Stat?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) You can realize that almost any statistic you see in the news is crap such that it is almost guaranteed to be misinterpreted.

2) If you really dig in you can internalize some of the mechanisms of statistics and use them to build mental models of probability in your head and better predict outcomes in a sense that might help you make better decisions to begin with.

3) You will better understand how the world around you operates and what the risks are in systems like the stock market. It won't make you a quant but it will help provide some intuition about these systems.

A good community online that I recommend with a grain of salt is lesswrong.com. They try to apply bayesian probability theory to daily life among other things along that train of thought. I say a grain of salt because they are almost worshipers of that model of the world even though it is not the only way to look at the world.
 
oddjobmj said:
1) You can realize that almost any statistic you see in the news is crap such that it is almost guaranteed to be misinterpreted.

2) If you really dig in you can internalize some of the mechanisms of statistics and use them to build mental models of probability in your head and better predict outcomes in a sense that might help you make better decisions to begin with.

3) You will better understand how the world around you operates and what the risks are in systems like the stock market. It won't make you a quant but it will help provide some intuition about these systems.

A good community online that I recommend with a grain of salt is lesswrong.com. They try to apply bayesian probability theory to daily life among other things along that train of thought. I say a grain of salt because they are almost worshipers of that model of the world even though it is not the only way to look at the world.

I understand that (and maybe I should've been more clear), but I was more interested in like what can you do with it in like a pure-science context.
 
zyj said:
I understand that (and maybe I should've been more clear), but I was more interested in like what can you do with it in like a pure-science context.
Statistical Mechanics and Quantum Mechanics both make use of probability theory. Statistical mechanics make use of more advanced probability theory, as far as I know.

Statistics is hugely important to interpreting the results of an experiment. A measurement is pretty useless if you don't know the accuracy and error that come along with it.

And, in a first probability course you will likely learn about counting/combinatorics and just general distributions and those just come up a lot in all types of areas.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top