I What Caused the Lower Resistance in the Second Graph?

MementoMori96
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi, in laboratory i had a sample of Ge with p-doping. In a first place i have done different measure V vs I (first image)

Then i insert the sample in a magnetic field perpendicular to the sample.

And i have done measure of V vs B (with a fixed current at 8 mA) and i obtained the second image.

As you can see at B = 0 the R is lower than the resistance of the first graph. Why ?

I suppose this third image

The is an accumolation of positive charges at right and so we measure a lower Voltage with a lower resistance

Can be this correct?
 

Attachments

  • resistenza.jpg
    resistenza.jpg
    19.8 KB · Views: 524
  • R(B).jpg
    R(B).jpg
    28 KB · Views: 542
  • Immagine.png
    Immagine.png
    4.9 KB · Views: 556
Physics news on Phys.org
MementoMori96 said:
As you can see at B = 0 the R is lower than the resistance of the first graph. Why ?
It looks like the top of your error bar at B=0 is close to what you measured in the first test. Why are the error bars so large?

Also, temperature will affect the "resistance" reading. How did you control for temperature?
 
Yes is close but with a Z test alpha 5% the two values are not compatible. The error bars are large due to the instruments. The temperature is the same.

What do you think about my idea?
 
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top