What causes an object to eventually come to rest after bouncing indefinitely?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shoku Z
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
An object dropped from a height will bounce indefinitely due to the coefficient of restitution, C, which determines the speed of each subsequent bounce. The velocity after each bounce can be expressed as v_n = C^n * u, suggesting that theoretically, the object never comes to rest as n approaches infinity. However, in practical scenarios, factors such as energy loss due to air resistance and surface imperfections cause the object to eventually stop bouncing. The discussion highlights the limitations of applying Newton's laws in idealized conditions and emphasizes the importance of considering real-world phenomena. Ultimately, while mathematical models suggest perpetual motion, physical realities lead to the object's eventual rest.
Shoku Z
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Suppose that an object is dropped from a height 'H'.The coefficient of restitution be C.
Now,C=v_1/u.Therefore,v_1=Cu
This v_1 is the speed with which it bounces.Then,it strikes the floor again.
And again,C=v_2/v_1

v_2= C.v_1 = C^2 u
Similarly,v_3= C^3u
v_4=C^4u and so on.

Suppose that the ball comes to rest after bouncing up n times.
Therefore,
v_n = 0
C^n.u = 0
And this is only possible when n tends to infinity.In other words,it never comes to rest.But,practically,this is not the case.How come?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all coefficient of restitution is
C=v/u simply in case of bouncing of a rigid ball on a rigid surface.Not , C=(v-1)/u.
Then, also this paradox arises as you mentioned .
we must not forget that we apply Newton's laws in some idealized cases. And this application may seem to be miraculous some time. But as we go into detail, not neglecting many phenomenons, then gradually we come close to physical reality.
In this case of bouncing object , we assumed it to be point particle. If we consider it to big enough ,then also bouncing height will never be equal to zero mathematically.But, the height achieved after several bouncing will be so small that we will not be able to distinguish it from
atomic motions.
 
No,its no v-1, its v_1.I don't know how to use subscripts on mobile.v_1 is the velocity with which the ball bounces up after striking the floor 1st time.
v_2 2nd time
v_n nth time
 
Then also logic is same,isn't it.
 
Yeah,just want to make it clear!
 
Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
Thread 'Does Poisson's equation hold due to vector potential cancellation?'
Imagine that two charged particles, with charge ##+q##, start at the origin and then move apart symmetrically on the ##+y## and ##-y## axes due to their electrostatic repulsion. The ##y##-component of the retarded Liénard-Wiechert vector potential at a point along the ##x##-axis due to the two charges is $$ \begin{eqnarray*} A_y&=&\frac{q\,[\dot{y}]_{\mathrm{ret}}}{4\pi\varepsilon_0 c^2[(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}+y\dot{y}/c]_{\mathrm{ret}}}\tag{1}\\...

Similar threads

Back
Top