What causes Bragg planes in materials?

ninevolt
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I am having trouble understanding what exactly Bragg planes are physically.
I understand how they behave, in that they act like mirrors and reflect matter waves, but what exactly is the wave bouncing off of?

for instance
jen%201.png


I can guarantee any physics textbook always has a picture like this, with the light bouncing off of what it seems to be nothing physical, not an atom, just the Bragg plane. I am really having trouble swallowing what exactly causes the Bragg plane. Or is it something that we just accept like electrons not emitting radiation in atoms even though they seem to be accelerating?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ninevolt said:
I am having trouble understanding what exactly Bragg planes are physically.
I understand how they behave, in that they act like mirrors and reflect matter waves, but what exactly is the wave bouncing off of?

for instance
jen%201.png


I can guarantee any physics textbook always has a picture like this, with the light bouncing off of what it seems to be nothing physical, not an atom, just the Bragg plane. I am really having trouble swallowing what exactly causes the Bragg plane. Or is it something that we just accept like electrons not emitting radiation in atoms even though they seem to be accelerating?

Well, what do you think the little spots in the diagram are? Reflection, even normal reflection off a mirror, is a scattering problem arising from groups of atoms responding to incident EM radiation - so the "bouncing off" analogy is flawed. A Bragg reflection plane is a plane in a crystal containing some significant fraction of the atoms that make up the crystal, and generally there are many such planes in a crystal depending on the symmetry of the atoms - the diagram you posted shows several, there are many more including many that are tilted into and out of the plane of the diagram. There's nothing unphysical or imaginary about them.
 
So are you saying that in real life the wave will reflect off of the atoms in the plane? And that macroscopically the atoms are close enough together to constitute the Bragg plane?

If this is the case, I still do not understand why the waves bounce off of the atoms as if they are in a plane. Atoms are round, and to my knowledge we would get a different reflection pattern that that of a simple plane.
 
Bragg reflection happens when the wavelength of the incident light is much larger than an atom. For high frequencies the light will impact a single atom, but for lower frequencies it affects many neighboring atoms. What does an individual atom see? It sees a uniform, slowly varying E field. When exposed to a uniform E field, an atom will become polarized, i.e. acquire an electric dipole moment. As the E field slowly varies, the dipole moment slowly varies, reradiating the light in all directions. Along the direction of a Bragg plane, the reradiated wavelets are in sync with each other and add constructively.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top