What Causes Galactic Plains?

  • Thread starter Thread starter M.C.
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Galactic plains form primarily due to the gravitational interactions and collisions between galaxies, similar to how planetary plains develop. The orbits of planets within a solar system tend to align over time due to repeated gravitational interactions, which create a "viscosity" effect that gradually settles their angular momentum into a common plane. This process involves significant energy loss and angular momentum cancellation over millions of years. Both galaxies and star systems originate from large rotating clouds of gas and dust, which retain angular momentum as they condense, leading to a flattened structure. The alignment of planetary orbits with the galactic plane is influenced by localized turbulence during the gas cloud's condensation.
M.C.
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
What causes Galactic Plains to form? Is it the same reason there is a planetary plain?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
http://www.kingsu.ab.ca/~brian/astro/course/lectures/winter/chp11.htm

i think mosty due to collision between galaxies
 
Last edited by a moderator:
so what causes the planetary plain?
 
Originally posted by M.C.
so what causes the planetary plain?

I want to understand your question better

first of all, the plane of the Earth's orbit is not quite the same as the plane of jupiter's orbit
or the plane of another planet
or the plane of the moon's orbit

all these planes are slightly tilted with respect to each other and do not exactly coincide

but I think you are asking why do they so NEARLY coincide
mostly they are tilted only a few degrees from each other

what evened them out?
if you started with a central star and 100 planets orbiting every which way around it
so the orbit-planes of the 100 planets are initially all tilted randomly by as much as 90 degrees from each other or even more
then what would cause those 100 planets to gradually
work out an approximate common orbit plane?

wolram mentioned collisions
and there is gravitational interaction which can ressemble a soft-core collision and happen repeatedly over millions of years
maybe it gives a kind of "viscosity" to a system of 100 planets
so that eventually their angular momentums boil down and settle down to one basic orientation that they all more or less agree on
(because otherwise they keep bumping and perturbing each other)

a lot of energy must get lost and a lot of angular momentum (in opposed directions) must get canceled out and it must be a long process (wouldnt necessarily be pleasant to witness either)
but something like viscosity keeps dragging on them and bugging them until they work out an approximate common plane

Let us try to get Phobos or Integral or some such astronomy honcho to pronounce the word on this
 
My guess would be that galaxies are planar for the same reason as star systems - they formed out of large rotating clouds of gas and dust. As the gas condenses, it retains its angular momentum and "settles down" to a plane. It's similar to the oblateness of the Earth due to its rotation, but taken to an extreme due to the gaseous nature of the cloud and the speed of rotation (Earth's surface rotates at about 1 kps; gas at 1AU goes around at about 30kps). I believe we are going around the center of the galaxy at about 200 kps, so despite the massive size it would still flatten out on a timescale of billions of years.

As a side note, how tilted is the ecliptic with respect to the galactic plane? What about for the orbits of extrasolar planets? I suspect that planetary orbits would be, for the most part, similar to the galactic plane, differences being due to localized turbulence in the original gas cloud as it was condensing.
 
Last edited:
Ok, I understand it now. Thanks for the information guys:smile:
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top