What causes materials to be lossy and how can this loss be measured?

  • Thread starter Thread starter randomafk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Materials
AI Thread Summary
Lossiness in materials, relevant to electromagnetics and acoustics, is primarily caused by energy dissipation during wave propagation, which can be quantified by the imaginary part of complex permittivity. Factors such as material density, temperature, and bond strength influence this lossiness, as energy is converted to waste heat when oscillating electrons collide with nearby atoms. Measurement of lossiness is indirect, typically involving the analysis of wave refraction and attenuation rather than direct assessment. For liquids, lower viscosity correlates with higher density, leading to increased interaction and energy loss during wave transmission. Understanding these principles is crucial for applications involving electromagnetic radiation and acoustic waves.
randomafk
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm trying to understand what makes materials lossy and how to measure that lossiness - this is for either/or electromagnetics or acoustics. So far, I haven't really found good explanations/resources other than that a complex permittivity can cause loss. However, how do viscosity or antennas cause loss, for instance? And moreover, how can these values be measured?

Sorry for the vague question, I'm not too sure on the subject itself.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An electrodynamic wave that passes through a medium induces oscillations in the electrons. They "ride the wave" in a sense, passing along the energy but not absorbing it. If something interferes with the electron's oscillation (such as bumping into a nearby atom), it is damped so that some of the energy it was going to pass along with the wave, it now looses to the thing it bumped into as kinetic energy. The more damping, the more the energy of the wave is converted to waste heat in the material and the weaker the traveling wave gets. This is lossiness and it is described mathematically by the imaginary part of the material's permittivity. Lossiness is a function of material density, temperature, bond strength, etc.

You don't measure lossiness directly. Rather, you measure the refraction and attenuation of a wave as it goes through a material, then http://faculty.uml.edu/cbaird/95.658%282011%29/Lecture2.pdf" from these parameters.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
randomafk said:
Hi,

I'm trying to understand what makes materials lossy and how to measure that lossiness - this is for either/or electromagnetics or acoustics. So far, I haven't really found good explanations/resources other than that a complex permittivity can cause loss. However, how do viscosity or antennas cause loss, for instance? And moreover, how can these values be measured?

Sorry for the vague question, I'm not too sure on the subject itself.

Thanks!

It's expressed in terms of dispersion. epsilon, mu and sigma ; permittivity,permeability and conductivity. They are related to Maxwell equations through constitutive relations. Send a wave which will obey reflection phenomena (wavelength of the wave should not be equal or greater than the length of the object you are sending the wave to, in other words no scattering) and measure the reflected part, subtract it from the original wave there you will have your true loss.

For a liquid, lower viscosity means higher density which can be interpreted as wave will interact more rapidly in a liquid with higher viscosity thus induce more loss.

Antennas can cause everything, they are the fundamental block of em radiation after all. Please be more specific.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top