What Causes Radio Stations to Mix and How Does it Affect Listening?

AI Thread Summary
Radio station mixing occurs when signals from different frequencies interfere, leading to listeners hearing unintended broadcasts. The electromagnetic field around the antenna combines all nearby waves, resulting in a single varying voltage output. For AM signals, the receiver's RF stage filters frequencies, but if two signals are close in amplitude, they produce a strong beat, making the desired program inaudible. FM signals are more complex, as the FM discriminator can capture the stronger signal while the weaker one may cause noise spikes if interference exceeds a certain threshold. Overall, reception quality is generally good within a station's service area, but outside it, listeners may experience abrupt signal switches.
the ads 13
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
What does it mean physically when radio stations mix? As in if you are listening to one station, but you begin to here another and eventually only here the wrong station.
 
Science news on Phys.org
The electromagnetic field around the antenna is the sum of all the waves (at all frequencies) in the vicinity. There is just one varying voltage at the output of the antenna. The RF stage of the receiver filters our all frequencies but those in the wanted channel. The detector (if we're talking about AM signals, this will just output the 'envelope' of the modulated signal) just detects the sum of the two signals which have been selected (i.e. just one varying voltage). When there is a big difference in amplitude, it will give you the envelope of the larger with extra garbage due to the interfering signal. You very often get a strong 'beat'. When the signals are nearly equal in amplitude, the beat is very strong and the wanted programme is inaudible - but what you hear is the sum of the two programmes plus this beat.

For FM signals, the situation is more complicated. After the RF filtering, the fm discriminator (not a simple detector) will give a signal which is proportional to the frequency of the stronger signal with a small amount of the weaker, due to the phase perturbation caused by the other RF signal. For wide deviation signals (fm broadcast), the carrier frequency sweeps over a large range and the interfering signal is 'drowned' by the larger one (the so-called Capture Effect) and so is the noise in the channel (often called the FM advantage over AM). When interference or noise are below a certain level, the demodulated signal is vey good because the frequency information is very robust but, past a certain 'threshold' level of noise or interference, the discriminator can no longer be 'sure' of the frequency it is looking at and you can get enormous noise spikes and the interfering signal can capture the receiver.
So, within the 'service area', you get pretty uniformly good reception but, outside it, the signal can be pretty useless and you will suddenly 'switch' to the other signal.

In your post, you use the word "mix". This, strictly, is what happens when there is a such a strong signal in a nearby channel that the non-linearities in the receiver generate 'artifacts' such as cross modulation. When this happens, the stronger signal, although at a different frequency, can produce frequency products that are audible. It is counter-intuitive but you can sometimes reduce the effect of a strong interferer by reducing the input of RF signal to the set as it reduces the effects of the non-linearity.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for the detailed answer.
 
I should add to the well described above post that in TV's they utilize frequency modulations by that I mean they adjust the aplitude and frequency of the signal in various undisclosed patterns ( to prevent ppl from stealing the signal via satelite) but also as a recognition method that aid in filtering unwanted signals. Radio doesn't care about stolen signals as they intentionally broadcast to everyone so they seldom if any utilze that methodology.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top