What Causes the Change in Direction of Induced Current in Magnetic Fields?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding the direction of induced current in magnetic fields, particularly when comparing two scenarios involving a current-carrying wire and a moving wire without current. It highlights that while Fleming's Left Hand Rule applies to the force on a current-carrying wire in a magnetic field, the induced current in a moving wire is opposite due to Lenz's Law. Participants express confusion over the use of left-hand versus right-hand rules, with a preference for the right-hand rule for clarity. The conversation also touches on the implications of induced electromotive force (emf) in both situations, questioning whether connecting an ammeter would show a drop in current. Overall, the thread emphasizes the complexities of understanding electromagnetic principles and the rules that govern them.
jkena04
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone

Ive got myself into a muddle over the forces involved in magnetic fields.

I understand that if a current carrying wire is perpendicular to a magnetic field then it will experience a force according to Flemings Left Hand Rule.

Now if a wire is to move in the same direction as the motion 'induced' above. at right angles to the same magnetic field (this time with no current flowing in it) the emf induced is in the opposite direction to the current in the top example. (If you try to use flemings left hand rule here the current goes in the complete opposite (wrong) direction.

What causes this change in direction? Surely both situations are identical, since the direction of motion and the direction of the magnetic field are the same in both, yet the current in one is in the opposite direction to the induced current in the other situation? Is it a product of Lenz Law?


Hopefully you can understand what I've said!

Look forward to your responses!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jkena04 said:
I understand that if a current carrying wire is perpendicular to a magnetic field then it will experience a force according to Flemings Left Hand Rule.
OK. Now ask yourself: If the wire were to move in the direction of the force, what direction would the induced current flow? Would it be in the same direction as the original current or opposite?
 
I've never heard of a left-hand rule. That's very confusing. Usually everything is right-handedly oriented. In the context of electromagnetism the most important rules are those for the vector product (in the magnetic part of the Lorentz force) and the relative orientation of area and its boundary in the integral form of Faraday's Law, which reads in the most general case of moving wires

\mathcal{E}=\int_{\partial F} \mathrm{d} \vec{x} \cdot (\vec{E}+\vec{v} \times \vec{B}) = -\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} t} \int_{F} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{F} \cdot \vec{B}=-\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} t} \Phi_{\vec{B}}.
 
vanhees71 said:
I've never heard of a left-hand rule.
There are many mnemonic rules (unfortunately) for various situations. (See: "[URL Left Hand Rule[/URL])
That's very confusing.
I agree. The only rule I ever use is the right hand rule for computing cross products.

(But I don't think confusion over the hand rule is the issue here.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok so in fact in the first situation an emf would be induced too in the opposite direction to the original current. So does this mean if you were to connect an ammeter to the wire in the first situation you would notice a drop in current?
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top