What causes the dimming effect in an LED with solar panel and mirror setup?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the dimming effect observed in an LED setup that includes a solar panel and an optical fiber. The LED's brightness diminishes due to energy losses during the light transfer to the solar panel, with significant inefficiencies in both the LED and solar panel impacting power regeneration. It is suggested that the LED may experience a partial shutdown controlled by a circuit that detects solar illumination, potentially causing rapid on-off cycling. The overall energy regeneration is minimal due to the low efficiency of the components, but the average current consumption might be reduced. The setup could serve as a useful emergency flashlight, although it would not provide a sustainable power source indefinitely.
Artlav
Messages
161
Reaction score
1
The ideas setup is this:
image_157.jpg


There is a LED with solar panel and a battery, from one of the sun-charged nightlights, and an optic fiber (the "mirror") that routes the light from the LED onto it's own solar panel.

The effect is that the light dims about half way down.

Question: What exactly happens in there?
Specifically,
-Does the LED gets continuously dimmer (and why)?
-Or, does it start to blink on and off very fast thus appearing dimmed (and why, what kind of wave would it be)?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Assuming the sun had gone down and the device's only source of power was the LED, I would think that it would gradually lose energy. Some of the radiant energy would become thermal(however small an amount) and it would eventually go out. Now, running on a full charge from the sun and then partially replenishing itself at the same time, it would probably last a very long time, certainly long enough to last until the sun came back(I would think, since the nightlight alone can do that), but it wouldn't last forever.

Could be worth giving it a try though, that would be an extremely useful emergency flashlight if you also rigged up a bright LED that wasn't feeding into the solar panel. It would drain faster, sure, but in an emergency I don't think you'd really care.
 
KevinMcGovern said:
Assuming the sun had gone down and the device's only source of power was the LED, I would think that it would gradually lose energy. Some of the radiant energy would become thermal(however small an amount) and it would eventually go out. Now, running on a full charge from the sun and then partially replenishing itself at the same time, it would probably last a very long time, certainly long enough to last until the sun came back(I would think, since the nightlight alone can do that), but it wouldn't last forever.

Could be worth giving it a try though, that would be an extremely useful emergency flashlight if you also rigged up a bright LED that wasn't feeding into the solar panel. It would drain faster, sure, but in an emergency I don't think you'd really care.
Sounds about right. I bet it would work better if you had a transparent solar panel. That could be quite useful.
 
I know there are windows which act as solar panels, but they're made in a different way than traditional silicon-cell solar panels, and they're much less efficient.
 
KevinMcGovern said:
I know there are windows which act as solar panels, but they're made in a different way than traditional silicon-cell solar panels, and they're much less efficient.
I guess that would be the trade off. It could be used to illuminate a room, if you had the panel directly opposite the light, and had the rest open.
 
my understanding is that solar panels are extremely inefficient... something on the order of 10 or 20%. Likely where most of the energy loss is occurring. It's been a while since I seriously looked into the technology, though, so I could be wrong.
 
Well, the biggest problem I see is the power transfer from the LED to the solar panel. ASSUMING the LED is low wattage (50mW) AND has a high efficiency light to power ratio (90%), AND that the light frequency output from the LED is a perfect match for the Solar Panel, AND that the solar panel is super efficient (30%), the MAXIMUM power from LED to solar panel output would be:
50mW * 0.90 * 0.30 = .0135mW. Adding the battery would actually make things worse. Without going into the vagaries of device latencies, I would guess the "lifetime" of this cycle would be in the nanosecond time domain, perhaps less.

Fish
 
The most important effect is likely to be partial shutting down of the LED by a circuit which senses when the solar cell is being illuminated. If this uses snap action (hysteresis) switching, one would expect to see cyclic switching on and off, at a rate depending on the response time of the circuit used.

There is probably very little regeneration of the battery charge going on here, because of the modest efficiencies of the solar cell and the LED. That said, since the LED is probably not running at full power all the time, the average current consumption may well be reduced.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top