What Causes the Higher Peaks and Damping Tail in the CMB Power Spectrum?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gluon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Damping
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the physical processes occurring before recombination that contribute to the higher peaks and damping tail observed in the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) power spectrum. Participants explore the implications of gravitational potential wells, pressure effects, and the nature of the CMB emission.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the first peak in the CMB power spectrum corresponds to a distance scale where matter had sufficient time to fall into a gravitational potential well.
  • Others propose that the second peak represents matter that fell into a potential well and then rebounded due to pressure, while the third peak involves matter that fell in, bounced out, and then fell back in again.
  • It is noted that dark matter contributes only to the odd-numbered peaks, as it does not experience pressure.
  • One participant explains that the damping tail results from the non-instantaneous emission of the CMB, leading to a blurry image of the early universe's plasma, which suppresses the short-wavelength signal.
  • Questions are raised regarding the low contribution of shorter wavelengths in the damping tail, with suggestions that the amplitude of temperature variations in the second and third peaks may be influenced by gravitational and pressure effects being out of phase.
  • A participant references a webpage by Wayne Hu to illustrate how the addition of baryons affects the relative heights of odd and even peaks, indicating that odd peaks are enhanced while even peaks are suppressed due to baryonic effects.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints regarding the mechanisms behind the peaks and damping tail, with no consensus reached on the specific contributions of gravity and pressure or the implications of baryonic matter on the peaks.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the relationship between gravitational potential wells and the behavior of baryons are not fully explored, and the discussion does not resolve the mathematical details of the contributions to the power spectrum.

gluon
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hello,can someone tell me the physical process ,which occurs before recombination, which is giving the higher peaks and the damping tail at cmb power spectrum?
 
Space news on Phys.org
gluon said:
Hello,can someone tell me the physical process ,which occurs before recombination, which is giving the higher peaks and the damping tail at cmb power spectrum?
The first (longest-wavelength) peak is a distance scale where matter had just enough time to fall into a gravitational potential well of that length scale. The second (shorter wavelength) peak is matter that had enough time to fall in and then, due to pressure, bounce back out. The third is matter that had the time to fall in, bounce out, then fall back in again.

Dark matter only contributes to the odd-numbered peaks, as it doesn't experience pressure.

The damping tail is due to a different effect: the CMB wasn't emitted instantaneously. It took time for the plasma in the early universe to transition to a gas, and this causes our image of the CMB to be blurry. Instead of seeing a crisp slice of the early-universe plasma, we see a thick, cloudy surface. This manifests by suppressing the short-wavelength signal.
 
why shorter wavelengths in the damping tail have so low contribution in the power spectrum?the amplitude of temprature variations of second and third peak is reducing because gravity and pressure is out of phase?
 
About even and odd peaks, Wayne Hu (U Chicago) has a webpage
http://background.uchicago.edu/~whu/intermediate/baryons.html
==quote==
Remember what happens when you add mass to a spring and let it fall in the gravitational field of the Earth. With more mass loading the spring, it falls further before pulled back by the spring. On the other hand, it rebounds to the same position it started from.

Since the odd numbered (first, third, fifth...) acoustic peaks are associated with how far the plasma "falls" into gravitational potential wells (how much the plasma compresses), they are enhanced by an increase in the amount of baryons in the universe. The even numbered peaks (second, fourth, sixth) are associated with how far the plasma "rebounds" (how much the plasma rarefies). Thus with the addition of baryons the odd peaks are enhanced over the even peaks. For example, baryons make the first acoustic peak much larger than the second. The more baryons the more the second peak is relatively suppressed.
==endquote==
 
gluon said:
why shorter wavelengths in the damping tail have so low contribution in the power spectrum?the amplitude of temprature variations of second and third peak is reducing because gravity and pressure is out of phase?
As I said above, the reason the shorter-wavelength peaks have smaller amplitudes is because our image of the surface of last scattering is blurry (the surface of last scattering is the matter that emitted the CMB).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K