What Causes the Optical Illusion in the Pale Blue Dot Photo?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Avathacis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dot
AI Thread Summary
The Pale Blue Dot photo, taken by Voyager 1 from 6.1 billion kilometers away, features Earth appearing to sit in a beam of light due to sunlight reflection off the spacecraft. This effect is described as an "accident of geometry and optics," where the positioning of the spacecraft relative to the Sun and Earth creates an optical illusion. Internal reflections within the camera can cause glare, which is similar to issues seen in terrestrial photography when bright light sources are nearby. The discussion emphasizes that this phenomenon is not unique to space photography but can occur in various contexts. Understanding these optical effects is crucial for interpreting images captured in space.
Avathacis
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
So as you might or might not know the Pale Blue Dot is a picture taken from the spacecraft Voyager 1 when it was 6.1 billion kilometers away from Earth.

Pale_Blue_Dot.png


To quote Carl Sagan: (of course there is a lot more quotable and more important material, but it serves for the question)

"Because of the reflection of sunlight off the spacecraft , the Earth seems to be sitting in a beam of light, as if there were some special significance to this small world; but it's just an accident of geometry and optics."

Can anybody explain (in detail) the "accident of geometry and optics"?

P.S. I'm not sure if this belongs in general physics (because i would guess that most of the explanation would take place on the grounds of optics and geometry) or if it belongs in astrophysics/astronomy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ant time you have a nearby bright source of light that isn't in the field of view you can still get a glare from internal reflections. It happens with eartbound pictures when the sun is nearby too.

[edit] Here's an example of the same phenomena screwing up a picture I took last week. Obviously, if the background of the pic is black, the flare looks even worse.
 

Attachments

  • P1020077.jpg
    P1020077.jpg
    71.4 KB · Views: 541
Last edited:
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top