What Causes the Real Increase in Liquid Volume in Thermodynamics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mohamedsafy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physical
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a student's confusion regarding the relationship between the real increase in liquid volume, apparent increase, and the volume of the container in thermodynamics. The student believes the formula should be adjusted but is encouraged to consider specific scenarios to clarify the concept. An exaggerated case is suggested to help visualize how changes in container volume affect perceived liquid volume. Additionally, the student seeks clarification on the definition of the universal gas constant R. Understanding these principles is crucial for mastering thermodynamics concepts.
mohamedsafy
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hi
iam a new user here iam a student in engineering faculty there is something i don't understand in thermo dynamics physics in my book it is written that the real increase in volume of liquid= the apparent increase in volume of liquid+ the increase in volume of the container
my opinion is that the real increase in volume of liquid = the apparent increase - the increase in the volume of the container the problem is driving me crazy ca anyone help me and explain to me
and there is another point i need to know the definistion of the universal gas constant R anyone interesed to help me
thx alot
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
To understand the book's statement, study this exaggerated case: Say the container volume doubles, but the apparent volume of the liquid does not change. What must be the real increase of the liquid volume?

If that doesn't click, look at it backwards. Say that both the liquid and the container volumes doubled. What would the apparent volume increase of the liquid be?
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top