What classes are you taking for Fall 2009?

[lubuntu]

Hi, thought this might be an interesting an kind of fun idea, post your 2009 schedule if your a student currently taking classes, also if you have some questions to ask the physics forums peanut gallery we can put them all in one space. I'll start

Classes
Linear Algebra- Using professors own text(with will certainly be supplemented with MIT video lectures.
Discrete Math- Using Rosen's Discrete Math and Applications
Calc III- Using Stewart
Physics 2 E&M Using Wolfson's University Physics
Dumb English Course

Questions
1.Is this too many courses to succeed in? I'm hoping to sweep the board with A/A- and perhaps 1 or 2 B+'s at the worst?

2. Anyone have any experiences with Rosen's Discrete Math? I've found very mixed reviews online.

3. Any other tips for success from anyone with regards to any of the specific classes?

Thanks PF!

 

[thrill3rnit3]

University Physics...by Wolfram?? Maybe you meant by Wolfson, or by Young and Freedman??

Your schedule looks pretty normal. The texts look like the regular texts used as well.

 

[lubuntu]

lol Yeah, I mean Wolfson, got those confused! Thanks for the correction.

 

[sciboinkhobbes]

I like this idea!

Classes:

• Quantum Mechanics - Griffiths, which I think I'll try and supplement with Mendl
• E & M II - Intro to Electrodynamics, Griffiths again
• Partial Differential Equations - Applied PDE, Haberman
• Astrophysics (emphasis on stars) - Intro to Modern Astrophysics, Carroll and Ostile (the BOB - big orange book)
• Intro to aikido...!

My questions:
1. Does anyone have any recommendations for someone just getting starting to scratch the surface of QM? Texts, materials, videos, anything that would help me immerse myself a bit? Same with E&M II?

2. Anyone else taking astrophysics?


Answers to lubuntu's questions:
1 & 2. Depending on how well you manage your time, it doesn't sound like too stressful of a course load to me - I think it could be handled quite successfully. In my experience, introductory linear algebra was quite straightforward, and calc III was just plain fun - not to mention a bit easier than calc II. I haven't yet taken discrete (waiting to take it from a particularly good prof) but it doesn't seem extremely difficult; unfortunately I haven't heard anything about the Rosen text, so I can't give my two cents there.

I'm not familiar with the Physics 2 text you're referring to, however... Physics 2 was, in my experience, a little abstract - I didn't have any experience beforehand with it, and so it was completely new and different. Definitely interesting, though, and there are a lot of good resources online. It may be a little more work to grasp all of the essentials, particularly if it's new to you.

I think you'll just have to manage the balancing act of having math homework from three classes, physics assignments, and English essays to write. If you really stay on top of things, and get all those assignments done on time - or even early! - you'll be saving yourself a world of hurt when exams and finals roll around. As long as you're doing your homework and reading up on things, none of the classes should be particularly horrifically challenging... Good luck!

3. Look into Div, Grad, Curl and All That by H. M. Schey for Calc III - it's an absolutely fantastic resource, clear and easy-to-read, and will come in handy for future courses requiring any sort of vector calculus.

 

[lubuntu]

I actually have the same Astrophysics book as I was intending to self study it at some point, my school unfortunately offers nothing like that. I think computation astrophysics is pretty much the coolest possible subject in the world!:)

 

[AUMathTutor]

Courses:
- Formal Languages & Theory of Computation
- Computer Networks
- Computer Architecture
- Software Process
- Independent study/thesis (climate modeling)
- Senior project (software design for satellite)

Questions:
- This Fall is going to suck.

 

[mordechai9]

1. Graduate electrodynamics (Jackson...)
2. Fundamentals of nuclear engineering (Nuclear physics)
3. Introduction to plasmas
4. Advanced Calculus II -OR- Methods of Computational Math I

Advanced calculus II covers chapters 9 and 10 of Rudin's PMA ("baby Rudin"), which I think would be really useful and interesting (rigorous calculus of several variables, linear transformations, intro to differential forms, etc.). The computational math class is like a graduate intro to numerical analysis class. This might be useful for my future research in using simulations, but it seems like the material is probably much more dry.

 

[cristo]

3. Any other tips for success from anyone with regards to any of the specific classes?

My tip: Don't be so blase about your English class. The ability to write well is an incredibly important skill that many science students completely overlook.

 

[n!kofeyn]

My tip: Don't be so blase about your English class. The ability to write well is an incredibly important skill that many science students completely overlook.

Came here to post that as well! I have definitely noticed a decline in my ability to write, at least in the technical and grammatical sense, since not being in an English, literature, or composition course since high school, and it is bothersome. You need practice at it just like anything else.

However, I will say that I agree that it is dumb, because it is probably a core course, and the overall course will be very strict about minor things and non-inspiring similar to most core courses. I knew a guy who wrote beautifully, but made a B in one of his college composition courses because his margins were a little off on his final paper.

 

[lubuntu]

Courses:
- Formal Languages & Theory of Computation
- Computer Networks
- Computer Architecture
- Software Process
- Independent study/thesis (climate modeling)
- Senior project (software design for satellite)

Questions:
- This Fall is going to suck.

I apologize for ever asking if my schedule was too much!

 

[Landau]

Classes

• Distributions - lecture notes, I'll supplement it with https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521649714/?tag=pfamazon01-20 and maybe https://www.amazon.com/dp/3540006621/?tag=pfamazon01-20 (although this is at a higher level than the course)
• Functional Analysis - lecture notes + everone is advised to buy one book. I'm going to buy https://www.amazon.com/dp/1406727911/?tag=pfamazon01-20 and maybe https://www.amazon.com/dp/0125850506/?tag=pfamazon01-20,although it's expensive. I have https://www.amazon.com/dp/1848000049/?tag=pfamazon01-20 on my computer.
• Foundations of Mathematics (axiomatic set theory, models, Gödel, ...) - lecture notes, I already have https://www.amazon.com/dp/0486616304/?tag=pfamazon01-20 (cheap Dover)
• Hamiltonian Dynamical Systems - lecture notes, I'll supplement it with https://www.amazon.com/dp/0387968903/?tag=pfamazon01-20
• Quantum Mechanics II - Sakurai, I'll supplement it with https://www.amazon.com/dp/9810241054/?tag=pfamazon01-20 since I don't like Sakurai's style very much.

I'll be 'student assistent' (TA?) for a first-year math class (foundations: naive set theory, proofs, primes, relations, functions, cardinality, ...)

I also wanted to take the class Differentiable Manifolds (at the level of Lee), but since it's known as our hardest course in the bachelor's it'll probably take too much time to combine with the above. Too bad. Unfortunately General Relativity (at the level of Carrol) also doesn't fit in my schedule. I wish I could buy time!

 

[DukeofDuke]

Great post idea!

Classes
1) French I (took this in high school so should be cake)

2) Elementary Differential Equations (ODE) -Differential Equations with Boundary Value Problems, 2nd edition, Polking, Boggess, and Arnold

3) Advanced Calculus I (Real Analysis) -Fundamental Ideas of Analysis by Michael Reed

4) Optics and Modern Physics (lot of stuff, basic second year course) - no idea what book, last semester we just used our prof's ebook in the works.

5) Cybernetworks and the Global Village (sociology class, should be cake and also fun)

6) Intermediate Tennis (half credit course)

And no, I don't know why our math department names things so strangely. I tell a friend from that community college down the tobacco road I'm taking "Advanced Calculus I" and he goes "didn't you take that sophomore year...in high school?" -_-

Questions
1) Am I going to die?

2) I'm taking Real Analysis for my math major, and ODE because I want to understand the differential form of Maxwell's equations and actually be able to solve the differential equations in physics, because I had to fudge them last semester. I am a physics/maths double major but I want to go to physics grad school (so far) and I've been thinking about dropping the math major if it hurts my gpa too much...so...if it turns out I'm dying, which class should I drop of the two?n ODE or Real Analysis?

3) I've taken linear algebra, but I doubt anyone in the cybernetworks class has. Are there any good pdf's floating around on basic network theory? I read an article in some bigshot science magazine that was on my research advisor's desk on it, seemed really fun actually.

 

[lubuntu]

I would think Real Analysis is less applicable to Physics than ODE's, I think they are pretty much indispensable.

 

[lubuntu]

My tip: Don't be so blase about your English class. The ability to write well is an incredibly important skill that many science students completely overlook.

Cristo has you are a UK national I'm guessing you've never never had the pleasure of taking a course in the US system? Little can you understand the inanity of some of the classes we are forced to take to get a Bachelors of SCIENCE. English classes here tend to be less about the mechanics of writing and more about serving as a platform for the Professors( and this term is used lightly) political and social views. Hilariously, they also try to sneak in the idea that the class will serve in developing your "critical thinking" skills. At my school this is particularly amplified as it is, in general, more gear to these liberal artsy, "Critical Analysis of Late 18th Century Northern New England Literary Women and their impact on the Industrial Revolution" type garbage.

I just really can't muster a lot of respect for that world and really kind of wish that the STEM education system was completely cut off from the Liberal Arts/Business/Soft Majors, as they are two completely different worlds. I enjoyed someone else's post awhile back as they mentioned in nearly all those area you can more or less fudge your knowledge and get by, usually by writing Postmodern-esque paper as the example titled above.

But I'm off on a rant now so, please continue the regularly scheduled thread...

 

[Topher925]

Courses
-Computational Heat Transfer
-Thermal Energy Transport


The majority of my time won't be spent on classes, it will be spent on TA responsibilities and my thesis.

 

[Newtime]

Classes:

1. Political Science (annoying core class...)
2. Linear Algebra I - using Strang's book
3. Analysis I/Advanced Calculus I - using Rudin and Wade
4. Modern Algebra I - using Fraleigh and I'll supplement with the giant Dover book by Warner
5. The Putnam Challenge - prep class for the exam; very excited about this one
6. E&M - standard intro class to E&M using University Physics by Young and Freedman



Questions:

Are you guys as excited about this Fall as I am?

 

[Pinu7]

Oh, you math nerds.

 

[lubuntu]

Classes:



Questions:

Are you guys as excited about this Fall as I am?

Indeed I am very excited as this semester will bridge the gap for me between Intro Level courses and upper level. I'm also taking on more a load than I have in the past.

 

[Hootenanny]

1. Does anyone have any recommendations for someone just getting starting to scratch the surface of QM? Texts, materials, videos, anything that would help me immerse myself a bit? Same with E&M II?

For QM I like Zettili, which is particularly good if you prefer a more mathematically rigorous approach. In terms of EM, my reference text is Grant & Philips, not sure how good it would be as a course text though.

 

[DukeofDuke]

Indeed I am very excited as this semester will bridge the gap for me between Intro Level courses and upper level. I'm also taking on more a load than I have in the past.

That's what she said

sry couldn't pass that up

Yeah I'm pretty excited too, mainly because my house is way too chill for my tastes. Its nice at first but it gets boring. Ready to get back to work hard play hard...cant wait to outdrink all the freshies at orientation.

 

[thrill3rnit3]

Man, I wish I can be a college student already

 

[Newtime]

Man, I wish I can be a college student already

Hah, you'll get there. I remember being in your position and I'll just tell you that your first time you're in your school's library to study for an extended period of time, you'll look up from one of your texts and just think "this is so damn cool," and the wait will have been totally worth it. Or at least, that's what happened to me. I love being able to learn as much as I want with next to zero real obligations other than that. Geez I can't wait to get back to school...

 

[Math Is Hard]

Man, I wish I can be a college student already

I wish I could be a college student again.

 

[sciboinkhobbes]

Cristo has you are a UK national I'm guessing you've never never had the pleasure of taking a course in the US system? Little can you understand the inanity of some of the classes we are forced to take to get a Bachelors of SCIENCE. English classes here tend to be less about the mechanics of writing and more about serving as a platform for the Professors( and this term is used lightly) political and social views. Hilariously, they also try to sneak in the idea that the class will serve in developing your "critical thinking" skills. At my school this is particularly amplified as it is, in general, more gear to these liberal artsy, "Critical Analysis of Late 18th Century Northern New England Literary Women and their impact on the Industrial Revolution" type garbage.

I just really can't muster a lot of respect for that world and really kind of wish that the STEM education system was completely cut off from the Liberal Arts/Business/Soft Majors, as they are two completely different worlds. I enjoyed someone else's post awhile back as they mentioned in nearly all those area you can more or less fudge your knowledge and get by, usually by writing Postmodern-esque paper as the example titled above.

But I'm off on a rant now so, please continue the regularly scheduled thread...

Speaking as a US college student at a moderately-sized public university, I'm afraid I'm going to have to agree with Cristo here - although I see where you're coming from as well, Lubuntu.

As a freshman, I took an orientation course taught by various physics faculty in my department, and the one aspect stood out to me. A particularly well-published and distinguished professor asked the class how many students loved physics, and all raised their hands. He then asked how many loved math; most, but not all hands went up. He then asked how many enjoyed writing, and only two students raised their hands again. He stated that the students who raised their hands for all three would likely be successful in the sciences, because the loves of science and math, and the ability to write well, are indispensable traits for those desiring to go into research (think grad applications, grant proposals, papers, etc.)

Now, it is not necessarily true that "Critical Analysis of Late 18th Century Northern New England Literary Women and their impact on the Industrial Revolution" is going to help you pass Calc III, neither will it necessarily help you get some fellowship. Yet, it never hurt to be well-read in various disciplines; the more you read, the better your writing becomes. Select an English course that sounds at least somewhat interesting to you, and plan to succeed and improve your skills in it. Avoid the professors who are pushing their political platforms or ideologies; by talking with a few English majors or browsing professor ratings online, you may get a better idea of who to avoid and who to actually learn from. I won't deny that English classes can range from respectable to completely bogus (probably an experience you've previously suffered through) - but the good ones are worth their while.

Having multiple English major roommates in the past, I can safely say that those who work diligently and passionately in their fields are just as respectable and intelligent as those in the sciences. There is a distinction between the extraneous fluff (postmodern fudging), and honest-to-goodness writing prowess/critical reading ability, and the latter really does prove to be an incredibly useful and admirable skill.

Also! If no English classes whatsoever interest you, you may want to consider a scientific/technical writing course, if your university offers it. Speaking to an adviser about substituting such a course may spare you some undue pain and tedious fluff.

 

[sciboinkhobbes]

For QM I like Zettili, which is particularly good if you prefer a more mathematically rigorous approach. In terms of EM, my reference text is Grant & Philips, not sure how good it would be as a course text though.

Wow, both of those recommendations sound fantastic - thank you!

 

[Tickitata]

Classes
1) Modern Algebra I - Dummit & Foote

2) Advanced Calculus I (Real Analysis) - Probably Rudin's PMA

3) Complex Variables - No idea what text.

4) Philosophy Of Religion - Professor's own textbook, among others.

5) Asian Philosophy - Several books.Questions
1) I was wondering: how beneficial do you think learning from multiple textbooks is? In particular, would it be worth it to purchase or borrow Artin's textbook to supplement Dummit & Foote?

2) As a math major who wants to go to grad school, what is your opinion on double majoring in philosophy purely out of interest? I find philosophy courses to be quite enlightening and a welcome change of pace, regardless of applicability.

3) The Algebra and Analysis sequences are cross listed as both upper division undergrad and first year Masters courses. Does anyone have advice for how to best take both concurrently?

 

[lubuntu]

Speaking as a US college student at a moderately-sized public university, I'm afraid I'm going to have to agree with Cristo here - although I see where you're coming from as well, Lubuntu.

As a freshman, I took an orientation course taught by various physics faculty in my department, and the one aspect stood out to me. A particularly well-published and distinguished professor asked the class how many students loved physics, and all raised their hands. He then asked how many loved math; most, but not all hands went up. He then asked how many enjoyed writing, and only two students raised their hands again. He stated that the students who raised their hands for all three would likely be successful in the sciences, because the loves of science and math, and the ability to write well, are indispensable traits for those desiring to go into research (think grad applications, grant proposals, papers, etc.)

Now, it is not necessarily true that "Critical Analysis of Late 18th Century Northern New England Literary Women and their impact on the Industrial Revolution" is going to help you pass Calc III, neither will it necessarily help you get some fellowship. Yet, it never hurt to be well-read in various disciplines; the more you read, the better your writing becomes. Select an English course that sounds at least somewhat interesting to you, and plan to succeed and improve your skills in it. Avoid the professors who are pushing their political platforms or ideologies; by talking with a few English majors or browsing professor ratings online, you may get a better idea of who to avoid and who to actually learn from. I won't deny that English classes can range from respectable to completely bogus (probably an experience you've previously suffered through) - but the good ones are worth their while.

Having multiple English major roommates in the past, I can safely say that those who work diligently and passionately in their fields are just as respectable and intelligent as those in the sciences. There is a distinction between the extraneous fluff (postmodern fudging), and honest-to-goodness writing prowess/critical reading ability, and the latter really does prove to be an incredibly useful and admirable skill.

Also! If no English classes whatsoever interest you, you may want to consider a scientific/technical writing course, if your university offers it. Speaking to an adviser about substituting such a course may spare you some undue pain and tedious fluff.

Agreed, however my point is that at least at my university these courses really offer no such thing. Grant if there we a pure writing course I would be glad to take, but these courses have a way of becoming something, well, different.

 

[Troponin]

CLASSES:
Numerical Analysis
Vector Calculus and Complex Variables
Intro to Sky and Solar System
Intro to Stars and Galaxy

QUESTIONS:
How is Vector Calculus at 5720 course number? Why did I have to speak with someone from the math department to get approval for vector calc? I don't quite know what to expect with this...I've found that Kreyszig's Advanced Engineering Mathematics was used a few years ago for this course. I purchased the book and it seemed to be on the same level as what I had in Calc III at a different University.

Why can't I get into a f'n physics class? I went back to school because I wanted to attend physics grad school...now I'm at 500 level in math courses and taking intro to sky and solar system in physics. My only physics course is Modern Physics at this point. *This is actually my fault. I have had to transfer because my wife graduate from Dental school and she is joining a practice in a different area, so I had a "pick from the leftovers" registration time...and of course Physics classes 20% PAST full...Math courses...plenty of room.*

Finally...am I going to like Numerical Analysis because it is something I can use in a practical manner for physics? Or will it be as boring as I've been told it is?
I'm actually looking forward to it...hope I'm not disappointed.

 

[lubuntu]

Intro to Sky and Solar System? what a bizarre name for a class!

 

[Luke1294]

I'm an EE, starting my senior year-

- Digital Signal Processing
- Control Theory
- Random Variables
- Senior Project (Doing a FPGA-based speaker identification system)
- Linear Algebra 2 (from Axler)

I'm particularly excited about working on my senior project, as it touches on elements from almost every EE course I've taken during undergrad.

 

[Troponin]

Intro to Sky and Solar System? what a bizarre name for a class!

The structure is even more bizarre...It's a prerequisite for an astronomy minor, but the class looks like a general student, math-free course. I'm guessing they just didn't have enough courses to warrant a minor and lumped these onto the program?

 

[Jack21222]

General Physics 2
Calculus 3
Microeconomics (stupid gen ed requirement)
Speech communication (another stupid gen ed)

Last semester at junior college, I get to transfer to a university in the spring semester. Luckily, when I transfer, practically all of my gen ed requirements will be over with.

 

[ice109]

advanced lab <- last physics class ever! so happy
advanced calc 1 - baby rudin
intro to abstract alg - hungerford
dis differential geometry - ?
spanish 3 - ?

 

[nicksauce]

Grad student now, so I only need to take one class, as well as research. Probably going to be radiation processes and gas dynamics (astrophysics). Might take QFT as well.

 

[iamthegelo]

- Mechanics of Solids
- Thermodynamics
- Systems Analysis
- Engineering Experimentation + Lab
- Intro to Pro Engineer
- Some G.E.'s
- Circuits Lab

 

[jin8]

I'm a physics major and will be a sophomore
Class Schedule:

1, Honors Real Analysis -- I think it should be elementary analysis course, still don't know what text we are going to use
2, Mechanics and Relativity 2 -- We'll use Thoronton and Marion
3, E&M1 -- Griffths
4, QM1 -- Griffths again and probably supplemented by Shankar
5, intro to CS-- Java


My question:
is it too much? I originally didn't register for EM, but my advisor told me I can't appreaciate QM fully without understanding EM. He suggest me take EM instead of QM
but I simply cannot wait to take QM, I want it so much
So my schedule may be a little bit weird though.. -_-

 

[bubbles]

Are you guys are on the semester system? Five classes seem a bit too much for me...
Anyway here is my fall schedule,

1. Intro to X-ray diffraction and materials characterization
2. XRD Lab
3. Intro to Solid State Physics
4. Thermodynamics of Materials

 

[ice109]

I'm a physics major and will be a sophomore
Class Schedule:

1, Honors Real Analysis -- I think it should be elementary analysis course, still don't know what text we are going to use
2, Mechanics and Relativity 2 -- We'll use Thoronton and Marion
3, E&M1 -- Griffths
4, QM1 -- Griffths again and probably supplemented by Shankar
5, intro to CS-- Java


My question:
is it too much? I originally didn't register for EM, but my advisor told me I can't appreaciate QM fully without understanding EM. He suggest me take EM instead of QM
but I simply cannot wait to take QM, I want it so much
So my schedule may be a little bit weird though.. -_-

doesn't make sense at all. you can't truly appreciate qm without having a rigorous classical mechanics course - that is true.

 

[n!kofeyn]

doesn't make sense at all. you can't truly appreciate qm without having a rigorous classical mechanics course - that is true.

I took a quantum mechanics course that used the Griffiths book, and I have never taken an electrodynamics course. There was no problem with the quantum mechanics course, so I don't see how you can't simply state that as truth. It's just an introduction so when you see quantum mechanics again you can pick up on the things you might have missed out not knowing some electrodynamics. Taking electrodynamics while taking quantum mechanics might give you an advantage since you'll be getting both point of views at the same time.

 

[djeitnstine]

My Fall 09 Schedule. I am entering Junior Aerospace Engineering with concentration on propulsion, minors in Math and CAD/CAM (Design)

1) Advanced Math for Engineers - Kreyzig
2) Structures 1 - ?
3) Electrical Engineering 1 -?
4) Electrical Engineering Lab
5) Thermodynamics
6) Aerodynamics 1
7) Experimental Aerodynamics
8) Experimental Aerodynamics Lab

Ahh yes: My question is what is the load of doing 2 labs like? Seems as if this semester will be a tad hectic but I will manage somehow. I will also be a grader and will possibly co-host a radio show.

 

[siyphsc]

Courses (1st yr grad student)
Quantum Mechanics - Book: Arno Bohm's book on QM
Quantum Field Theory - Book: Bjorken and Drell V 1 and 2 (not sure why not Peskin...)
Graduate Research

 

[Landau]

My question: is it too much? I originally didn't register for EM, but my advisor told me I can't appreaciate QM fully without understanding EM. He suggest me take EM instead of QM but I simply cannot wait to take QM, I want it so much. So my schedule may be a little bit weird though.. -_-

I don't know you; a genius can take 10 classes, for a dumb person two classes are too much. I'd say that it's doable, I always take 5 or 6 classes while 4 is 'normal'. Just spend your time wisely, and don't get behind.

I took a quantum mechanics course that used the Griffiths book, and I have never taken an electrodynamics course. There was no problem with the quantum mechanics course, so I don't see how you can't simply state that as truth.

Reread his statement: he replaced EM by CM (classical mechanics), so he agrees with you about the EM part.

 

[n!kofeyn]

I don't know you; a genius can take 10 classes, for a dumb person two classes are too much. I'd say that it's doable, I always take 5 or 6 classes while 4 is 'normal'. Just spend your time wisely, and don't get behind.
Reread his statement: he replaced EM by CM (classical mechanics), so he agrees with you about the EM part.

Yea, you're right. I read "doesn't make sense at all" to mean it doesn't make sense to take EM and QM at the same time. My fault. Although, I also took my quantum class without having a course in classical mechanics (besides the first year sequence in physics), and it still went fine. I probably missed some analogies, but for a book like Griffiths, which is problem oriented, I don't think it's as big a deal early on.

 

[naele]

Advanced Calculus (ie, intro analysis) don't know which book
Physical Chemistry - McQuarrie
EM - Griffiths

I was going to take classical mechanics but for some reason the physics department canceled it.

 

[Hootenanny]

I was going to take classical mechanics but for some reason the physics department canceled it.

Your physics department canceled classical mechanics?! Seriously? Does your university off any classical mechanics course, run by say the Mathematics School?

 

[n!kofeyn]

Your physics department canceled classical mechanics?! Seriously? Does your university off any classical mechanics course, run by say the Mathematics School?

Courses usually will get canceled in the US if there aren't enough people enrolled. Although, I don't know if that's the case here. For instance, my undergraduate quantum mechanics class only had me (a math major) and an electrical engineering major in it. Only two students and no physics majors. I think the only reason it was kept was that both of us were graduating and needed it for our minor/double majors.

 

[Hootenanny]

Courses usually will get canceled in the US if there aren't enough people enrolled. Although, I don't know if that's the case here. For instance, my undergraduate quantum mechanics class only had me (a math major) and an electrical engineering major in it. Only two students and no physics majors. I think the only reason it was kept was that both of us were graduating and needed it for our minor/double majors.

I didn't know that colleges cancel courses if there aren't enough students, surely even if one students is enrolled on a course it should still be run. In the past, I have attended a Master level course where I was the only student enrolled, but the university still ran it!

This issue aside, sure Classical Mechanics should be a compulsory course for Physics, Applied Math, Engineering Majors etc.?

 

[naele]

Your physics department canceled classical mechanics?! Seriously? Does your university off any classical mechanics course, run by say the Mathematics School?

Nooooo they just canceled it for the fall term. Probably an instructor snafu, but I don't know. Either way it means i'll be taking it later in the year I guess which is ok. I was hoping to get into the lagrangian/hamiltonian formalism before I take QM but oh well.

 

[n!kofeyn]

I didn't know that colleges cancel courses if there aren't enough students, surely even if one students is enrolled on a course it should still be run. In the past, I have attended a Master level course where I was the only student enrolled, but the university still ran it!

I agree that they should still be run, but they aren't always. I know that there have been courses canceled due to low enrollment, especially if there is more than one section, although I don't think it happens all that often. A master's course is different I think because that is a course that is expected to have low enrollment.

 

[jaska22]

1. Quantum Mechanics - Griffiths
2. E & M - Wangsness
3. Linear Algebra - Lay
4. Higher math - Chartrand

This is my senior year and I will be adding my general and subject GRE's (for which I haven't started studying yet) as well as grad school applications.

I was at first worried since my advisor said that I shouldn't take E & M and Quantum together, but it feels good to know that most of you guys are taking it as well.

I have a feeling that I may have some time management issues, so any tips about classes, gre's or applications would be helpfull. However I will be looking into some supplementary books you guys suggested already.

So, good luck everyone.