What Compounds Form When Every Element Is Combined in a Box?

  • Thread starter Thread starter samblohm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Element
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the hypothetical scenario of placing one atom of every element in its elemental form into a single box and exploring the resulting compounds. Participants acknowledge the impracticality of the idea, especially considering the reactivity of many elements. They clarify that highly radioactive elements are excluded from consideration. The conversation highlights that while individual atoms, particularly reactive ones, would likely react immediately upon contact, predicting the final compounds formed is complex. Some stable compounds, such as lithium fluoride (LiF), sodium chloride (NaCl), and magnesium sulfide (MgS), are mentioned as likely outcomes. The challenge of determining the lowest energy combinations of these elements is noted, emphasizing that the starting positions of the atoms would significantly influence the reactions. Overall, the discussion reflects on the chaotic nature of mixing elements and the vast number of potential compounds that could arise from such an experiment.
samblohm
Messages
60
Reaction score
1
If you were to put 1 atom every element in its elemental form in a box, what would be the resulting compounds?

1.) I know it's probably impossible.
2.) I don't mean highly radioactive elements (transuranium metals, francium, radon, astatine, etc.)
3.) I'm really only talking about some of the more reactive elements-I don't really care what happens 90% of the elements.
4.) If it's possible, don't take into account the starting positions of the atoms.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
You mean all atoms - 1 of each element - in ONE box?

--
methods
 
I think the only impossible part about this is getting all the atoms together in the box before some of them start reacting. How about for the sake of observation, you use 1 mole of each element, instead of 1 atom?

This is an interesting question, so I'm a little hesitant to answer since I have a feeling it might be more complicated than I'm thinking. You can't really ignore the starting positions, since that ultimately will determine which reactions occur. A few compounds that come to mind as being likely to form: LiF, NaCl, KBr, BeO, MgS, etc. Obviously the most stable compounds will be the ones left in the end, so this is the basis of my prediction.
 
Perhaps a more tractable way of posing the question is to ask: what is the lowest energy way of combining one atom of each element. The answer is not likely to be easy to find, but at least it will have a single defined answer as opposed to worrying about starting conditions.
 
It's a silly and unanswerable question. Individual atoms (with the exception of noble gases) will typically immediately combine with the first atom they run into. Assuming nothing more complicated than diatomic molecules are formed, that still means over 10,000 possible compounds.
 
This reminds me of when I was a kid and somebody gave me a chemistry set.I got bored by following the experiments in the instruction booklet so I mixed everything together and tried to set it all alight.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top