What Computational Tools Are Used in EE for Solid-State and Laser Research?

  • Thread starter Thread starter creepypasta13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ee
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the computational tools used in electrical engineering (EE) for solid-state and laser research. The original poster expresses a desire to engage in computational methods related to quantum mechanics, particularly in the context of lasers and solid-state physics, while noting a lack of computational work in current EE research. Suggestions include exploring condensed matter physics and electrochemistry, with an emphasis on energy storage devices that often begin with numerical modeling. The poster clarifies their disinterest in devices like capacitors and batteries, reaffirming their focus on lasers. Overall, the conversation highlights a gap in computational opportunities within the EE field for those interested in theoretical applications.
creepypasta13
Messages
370
Reaction score
0
So I have a background in physics and applied math, but am considering graduate studies in EE. I know that some areas in EE, such as signal and image processing, use a lot of applied math, but I'm not that interested in those areas. I'm mostly interested in solid-state, lasers, and optics, but am not too interested in using E&M too much (especially at the level of graduate level theoretical physics E&M). I've looked at some research done by EE professors in those areas, but it seems mostly experimental, with not much computational work. I heard that one area of computational work in EE is computational electromagnetics, which honestly doesn't sound too interesting. I was hoping there were comp. methods used for the quantum mechanics side (other than for quantum computing), since that was my favorite class in physics.

Are N-body simulations, molecular dynamics, density functional theory, and/or other computational tools used in EE, in particular in lasers and solid-state? I really would like to utilize numerical analysis, numerical PDEs, and such for those areas, as I know those are used for other areas of physics, like CFD
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
so does anyone know? from what I've seen of EE profs, its mostly experimental work, with not many people doing computational work
 
creepypasta13 said:
so does anyone know? from what I've seen of EE profs, its mostly experimental work, with not many people doing computational work

You'll often find that an EE's favorite computational software is solder. It sounds to me like you may want to go into condensed matter physics or perhaps electrochemistry. I think you should research energy storage devices such as super-capacitors, batteries, and even superconductivity. Those are all areas that are more theoretical and the research projects usually begin with a numerical model on a computer.
 
Topher925 said:
You'll often find that an EE's favorite computational software is solder. It sounds to me like you may want to go into condensed matter physics or perhaps electrochemistry. I think you should research energy storage devices such as super-capacitors, batteries, and even superconductivity. Those are all areas that are more theoretical and the research projects usually begin with a numerical model on a computer.

oh, well I'm not all that interested in devices such as capacitors and batteries. I was more interested in devices like lasers. Yeah I guess you're right in that I should just go into condensed matter instead
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...

Similar threads

Back
Top