What Determines Surface Charge Density Inside a Cavity: A or B?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the surface charge density at two locations, A and B, within an ellipsoidal cavity of a cuboidal conductor, with a charge qo placed at the center. Two arguments are presented: one suggests that the sharper curvature at A leads to a higher charge density, while the other argues that since qo is closer to B, the charge density there should be greater. The consensus is that the second argument is correct, as the electric field must be stronger at B due to the constant potential condition of the conductor. Consequently, the surface charge density at B is indeed higher than at A. This highlights the complexities of electrostatics in non-uniform geometries.
i_island0
Messages
123
Reaction score
0
The figure shows a cuboidal shaped conductor inside which there is an ellipsoidal cavity. The center of the cavity is at the center of the cuboid.

Link to figure: http://www.picscrazy.com/view/1qtB9

A charge qo is kept at the center of the cavity. I am showing two positions 'A' and 'B'. MY question is in which location, among 'A' and 'B', (on the inner surface of cavity) the surface charge density will be more. At 'A' or at 'B'.

I have two arguments to present:
(i) The system will try to minimize its energy - so, in that case the surface charge density at B will be less than surface charge density at A. Or to say in other words, since the radius of curvature at B is more, so the charge at B will be less. A is sharper than B so charge density at A will be more.
(ii) now charge qo is closer to B than A. So shouldn't i conclude that charge density at B will be more than charge density at A. Since charge qo is closer to B, so electric field lines will be more dense near B, so the charge density at B will be more.

I m not sure which of the arguments is correct. And why? can anyone help me in this. ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
B has the higher surface charge density.
Your argument (i) is wrong because the curvature wrt the conductor is actually negative for this geometry.
For a charge outside a conducting ellipsoid, the SCD would be greater at the end.
 
(ii) is correct. More rigorously, the conductor will be at a constant potential, and so the line integrals of the electric field from q0 to B and from q0 to A must be the same. Therefore, the magnitude of the field at B must be higher than A.
 
wow, sometimes the explanations are so simple, but yet so tough to think
thanx to both of you
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top