What Determines the Breaking Point of a Bridge Under Increasing Load?

AI Thread Summary
The breaking point of a bridge under increasing load is determined by the balance between the normal force and the material's tensile strength. As the load increases, the normal force also increases until it can no longer support the weight, leading to failure. The tension created in the material when it bends contributes to this failure, as it can exceed the internal forces holding the material together. In contrast, arch structures convert load forces into compression, which is less damaging to materials like stone. Understanding these mechanics is crucial for bridge design and safety.
Couperin
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
This is a very basic concept but I can't seem to explain it properly.

Say you have a simple bridge made from two bricks that are, say, a metre apart, and a piece of wood spanning them. If you put a load on the wooden bridge, a normal force acts upward on the load. If you keep increasing the load, the normal force gets bigger.

At what point can the bridge no longer increase the normal force, i.e. what is it about a heavy object that causes the bridge to snap?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do things break?
 
When the plank bends slightly the normal force creates a tension in the material. When this tension reaches a value greater than the forces holding the material together, the material cracks.

In an arch, the load force is turned into compression which is much less destructive on stone, say.
 
Thank you very much
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top